Louis M. Reigel, III - PART 2
The Gaza-Katrina Connection
|
|
Is it mere coincidence that Reigel was in charge of the New Orleans FBI Field Office before becoming Cyber Chief in Feb. 2005?
Was Katrina a genuine natural disaster or retaliation against Bush for encouraging the Gaza withdrawal?
Is Reigel an FBI official or an Israeli spy?
Introduction by Salvador Astucia, Sep. 11, 2005
Main article by Mike Blair
It's interesting that FBI Cyber Chief Louis Reigel is from New Orleans, the city struck by Hurricane Katrina (shortly after the Gaza pullout) and President Bush is taking quite a bit of heat for the disaster. Recently the American Free Press published an article, written by Mike Blair, which presented a theory that the United States government has the ability to control the weather, and insinuated that Hurricane Katrina could have been avoided. This is an interesting topic and I agree with some aspects on a conceptual level. Having stated that, I have found no evidence that the U.S. government has the ability to control the weather in the sense that they can turn weather events off as well as on. Through nuclear technology, it is a fact that we can set off natural disasters like earthquakes, for example. In 1971, the U.S. government conducted an underground nuclear test in Alaska that set off 22 small earthquakes. (See description.) This is not a theory, it is fact. Given that, I can certainly entertain the possibility that a nuclear explosion detonated in a precise manner within the atmosphere might trigger or emulate a hurricane. So in that sense, it seems possible that we may be able to "control" the weather. But I do not see how we could turn off a natural disaster once it has started, even with the use of nuclear technology. On this point I disagree with Mr. Blair's thesis about controlling the weather. Still I think it is most interesting that FBI Cyber Chief Louis Reigel was Special Agent in Charge of the New Orleans Field Office prior to being promoted to his present job in Feb. of 2005. (See Reigel's bio.)
In another article, I presented evidence which questioned Mr. Reigel's patriotism, even questioned if he was involved in a foiled plot to assassinate President Bush because of Bush's support for the withdrawal of settlers in Gaza, and because Zionist fanatics feared he might withdraw troops from Iraq. (See article.)
Although I disagree with some of Mr. Blair's arguments, at least his article gets people thinking outside the box. If Hurricane Katrina was somehow manufactured or manipulated, it could have been done to destroy Bush politically, having escaped an assassination plot (theoretically anyway). Louis Reigel's past experience at the New Orleans Field Office draws even more suspicion that more is involved with Katrina than mere bad weather.
Please read Mike
Blair's interesting article
from American Free Press's website:
HARNESSING WEATHER
ALLEGATIONS SURFACE THAT U.S. & RUSSIA HAVE TECHNOLOGY TO MANAGE HURRICANES
By Mike Blair, September 2005
Author Sydney Sheldon said, "The old adage that everyone talks about the
weather but no one does anything about it is no longer valid," in an
afterword to his fascinating novel Are You Afraid of the Dark?
"Today," Sheldon continued, "two superpowers have the ability to control
weather around the world: the United States and Russia. Other countries,
probably China and North Korea, are working feverishly to catch up."
As this article was being written the aftereffects of Hurricane Katrina were
still being felt in the southeastern United States, after it caused billions
of dollars in damage along the Gulf of Mexico coast, and the death toll from
the killer storm was still being tabulated.
Could this devastation have been avoided? Could Katrina itself have been
avoided as a death-dealing hurricane?
The answers to both questions are probably "Yes." The ability of Russia and
the United States to create storms of this magnitude definitely exists.
The big question that remains is, why, then, wasn’t Katrina stopped before
it devastated three states--Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi--along the
Gulf Coast?
There could be any number of reasons, but all would be mere speculation, as
the fact is nothing was done to stop Katrina.
Those who doubt that Katrina, or any other hurricane, could be stopped--or
created--can find substantiation in a long-forgotten article by Chen May Yee
in the Nov. 13, 1997, issue of The Wall Street Journal.
The article recounts an offer by the Russians to aid Malaysia to create a
typhoon to dissipate a pall of smoke that hung over the country--and still
does--caused by the burning of large sections of the rain forests in
Indonesia and Sumatra.
To quote from the article: Datuk Law Hieng Ding, Malaysia’s minister for
science, technology and the environment at the time, said his country "would
use special technology to create an artificial cyclone to clean the air."
The article went on to say that a Malaysian company, BicCure Sdn. Bhd.,
would sign a memorandum of understanding with a government-owned Russian
company to create a cyclone that would cause torrential rains and thus
cleanse the air over Malaysia of the smoke and ash.
What Russian company was the Malaysian official talking about?
On Oct. 2, 1992, The Wall Street Journal reported that a Russian company,
Elate Intelligent Technologies, Inc., has weather control equipment for sale
and uses the advertising slogan of "weather made to order."
Igor Pirogoff, director of the company, said "Elate is capable of
fine-tuning weather patterns over a 200-squaremile area for as little as
$200 U.S. per day," the newspaper reported.
A year before the article was written, Hurricane Andrew caused $30 billion
in damages as it plowed through the South. Pirogoff said Andrew could have
been turned into "a wimpy little squall."
According to a UN pamphlet, titled Basic Facts about the United Nations,
which was published in 1994, the world body negotiated the Convention on the
Prohibition of Military or Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification
Techniques in 1977. This "prohibits the use of techniques that would have
widespread, long-lasting or severe effects through deliberate manipulation
of natural processes and cause such phenomena as earthquakes, tidal waves,
and changes in climate and in weather patterns."
Getting back to Malaysia, where the potential for creating or dissipating
cyclones seems to have made its first appearance, there was never any
follow-up to the stories about Elate and whether in fact the cyclone was
created, although it was approved by the Malaysian government.
A call by American Free Press to the Malaysian Embassy in Washington found
no one there with any knowledge of the subject.
However, there was more success when the Malaysian delegation to the UN was
contacted in New York. There, a spokesman claimed to have no knowledge of
the creation of a cyclone, but was willing to discuss weather control in his
country.
The official said that, by using weather control technology, rain could be
created and was being created over the nation’s capital of Kuala Lumpur.
He said that often rain was created over the city to cleanse the air of the
smoke emanating from Indonesia, and particularly Sumatra.
He indicated he did not know if the technology being used had been obtained
from Russia, but it would appear that such technology to create rain on
demand would not have been developed in a Third World country like Malaysia.
There have been numerous reports in recent years about strange changes in
the jet stream, which have created alterations in the weather.
In 1982 a report by a Pentagon researcher, identified as L. Ponte, noted
that "the Soviets have made advances in bending the all-important jet stream
that sweeps across Siberia to set global wind patterns. By using explosive
devices in the jet stream, scientists are trying to make it dip and rise in
a wave that could replace the frigid Siberian winters with milder air from
the South."
How this would affect weather in other parts of the world was not reported
by Ponte, but there have been dozens of reports since his 1982 report about
changes in the jet stream’s normal behavior.
In 1996, a group of seven U.S. Air Force officers, who had prepared a
research paper about weather warfare, issued a report, which concluded that
there was technology under development that would provide "warriors of the
future" with the means to control the course of military conflicts,
including through the use of weather modification.
The study also states that manipulation of precipitation, storms and fog
could improve America’s own weather but could also involve controlling the
ionosphere to guarantee U.S. dominance of worldwide communications.
Is major weather control really possible? Is weather manipulation a means of
conducting war? If not, why in 1977 did the United States, the then-Soviet
Union and dozens of other countries believe it was a good idea to enact a UN
treaty banning weather manipulation as a means of conducting war?
In the afterword of his book, Sheldon concludes:
“Weather is the most powerful force we know. Whoever controls it can disrupt
world economies with perpetual rainstorms or tornadoes; wipe out crops in a
drought; cause earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis; close world airports
and cause devastation on enemy battlefields. "We could all sleep better if a
world leader said, ‘Everyone talks about the weather, but no one does
anything about it, and it was true."
(Issue #37, September 12, 2005)
Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long
as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE,
Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
The above article first appeared on the American Free Press website at the following URL:
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/harnessing_weather.html
Salvador Astucia has written a book, Opium Lords, which deals with the opium-rich Golden Triangle and how it was used to pay the men who killed President John F. Kennedy. Astucia has written a second book, Rethinking John Lennon's Assassination: The FBI's War on Rock Stars. To read either or purchase, click here: