Bush’s Republican Socialism
: Homeland Security, Gary Condit, & Chandra Levyby Salvador Astucia, July 14, 2002 (revised July 21, 2002)
Everyone knows that President Bush is trying to reorganize the federal government around Homeland Security in response to terrorist attacks on America on September 11, 2001, but few people realize that Homeland Security was already a working group in the House of Representative months before the 9-11 attacks. And who was in the middle of the proceedings? California Congressman Gary Condit.
The Condit-connection sheds new light on both the "disappearance/murder" of Chandra Levy and President Bush’s "compassionate-socialist" program known as Homeland Security. Not only has the Republican President turned his back on free market principles by kicking corporations like WorldCom when they’re down and on the verge of bankruptcy, but he is building a totalitarian state around a new socialist concept known as Homeland Security. He is destroying the free market and building a huge socialist war machine. Israel has a similar economic structure backed by the socialist Histadrut.
With the advent of Homeland Security, Bush has abandoned the traditions of Abraham Lincoln and Robert Taft. His war machine is more akin to the liberal-socialist agenda of FDR’s New Deal (aka, the "Jew" Deal).
The mysterious disappearance and "death" of Chandra Levy is highly suspicious in its own right, but even more so when one considers that Gary Condit was an important member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, a committee which oversees the House Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security.
I will state up front that I suspect that Chandra Levy is still alive, at least no compelling evidence has been presented to convince me otherwise. To believe that she is dead requires that I rely on the collective word of the American news media, a group that simply does not deserve my trust or anyone else’s.
It is important to remember that Levy and her family are Jewish. She was also interested in espionage as a career, a fact that no one refutes. Put those two facts together and her disappearance suddenly has all the earmarks of an Israeli spy operation. The Israelis were apparently getting their ducks in a row on Capitol Hill as a prerequisite for 9-11. Legislative leaders of all intelligence committees would have to be loyal to Israel prior to the 9-11 attacks. Otherwise, they would have to be removed or destroyed politically.
Levy and her parents were likely working for Mossad, or some Israeli espionage agency, on a mission to destroy the career of Gary Condit—thereby gaining complete control of Senate and House intelligence committees—in preparation for the September 11th terrorist attacks. I further suspect that the stated attacks were not sponsored by Osama bin Laden's Al-Queda group, but were conducted by Israel working in league with the US military.
As we know, Condit was the California Congressman whose political career was destroyed over Levy’s disappearance, which was intensified by endless media hype. Condit was tried and convicted in the press not only for allegedly having an affair with Levy, but for murdering her as well—even before her body was found.
How many people are aware that Condit has been the Ranking Democrat on the "Subcommittee on Intelligence Policy and National Security" in the 107th Congress? In addition, Condit is a member of two other intelligence subcommittees: (a) the Subcommittee on Terrorism and Homeland Security, and (b) the Subcommittee on Human Intelligence, Analysis, and Counterintelligence.
How many people knew that a working group for Terrorism and Homeland Security had been established in the House of Representatives months before September 11, 2001? Shortly thereafter, it became a bona fide intelligence subcommittee. The following is a description of its creation by Saxby Chambliss, chairman of the subcommittee:
| At the beginning of the 107th Congress,
Speaker J. Dennis Hastert established a Terrorism and Homeland Security
Working Group under the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
The Speaker prophetically understood that the issue of terrorism needed to
be further addressed beyond the actions the U.S. Congress had already taken. In light of the horrific terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Speaker Hastert and Minority Leader Gephardt elevated the Terrorism Working Group to Subcommittee status. Their intent was to provide focus and have the subcommittee serve as the central hub for gathering and disseminating information on terrorism in the U.S. House of Representatives. |
Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga
Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Terrorism
and Homeland Security
http://intelligence.house.gov/terrorism.htm
Regarding Chandra Levy’s so-called death, some of the experts who examined her "remains" were right in the middle of other sensational deaths. Levy’s remains—which were discovered last May 22nd—were reportedly studied by Drs. Douglas Owsley and Douglas Ubelaker, forensic anthropologists at the Smithsonian Institution's Museum of Natural History.
Independent investigator Carol Valentine uncovered that Owsley and Ubelaker were utilized to examine the remains of people killed at Waco and the 9-11 attacks. Valentine wrote an article, Pentagon Cadavers Meet The "Bone Guys" (June 20, 2002), which provided credible and verifiable evidence that Owsley and Ubelaker signed fraudulent autopsy reports to cover up the fact that Branch Davidians had been killed prior to the FBI raid on April 19, 1993.
In other words, there is credible and verifiable evidence that Drs. Owsley and Ubelaker participated in the cover-up of mass-murder by the US Government at Waco. Now these same guys are deeply involved in 9-11 and the Levy case. They are apparently being used to sign fraudulent autopsy reports indicating that victims died from causes different from what really occurred. In fact, in Levy’s case, Drs. Owsley and Ubelaker apparently went a step further. They reported that Levy was dead when, in all likelihood, she is very much alive—probably living in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem and fulfilling her livelong dream of making espionage her career.
Again, it seems highly plausible that if Israel and the US government were planning 9-11 months in advance, then they needed to get their ducks in a row in the House and Senate intelligence committees. Any committee chairman or ranking member who would not play ball with the Jewish elite would have to be removed by any means necessary.
With this in mind, allow me to pose some questions:
Question # 1:
Why would no individual reporter at the Washington Post write about the recovery of Chandra Levy’s remains? In every story about Levy’s "untimely demise," about ten reporters would attach their names to it. The mere fact that no individual reporter would take credit for this story indicates that it's likely a fabrication, a hoax.
Question # 2:
Why did Washington, DC medical examiner Dr. Jonathan Arden (a Jew) make the following public announcement: "We may never know what happened to Chandra Levy."(?) Dr. Arden made this astonishing remark on May 28, 2002, nearly a week after Levy’s "remains" were found.
Question # 3:
Why has no reporter followed up on Condit’s assertion that Levy was interested in a career with the FBI, CIA, or NSA? Levy’s interest in an espionage career further supports my suspicion that she likely worked for Mossad, and her disappearance was an Israeli intelligence operation intended to destroy Gary Condit’s political career, thereby removing him from all House Intelligence subcommittees.
This is what Condit told Connie Chung about Levy’s interest in espionage (in a televised interview):
| …Chandra was interested in working at the FBI. She was interested in working at the CIA, or NI-, NSA. Something like that. She was very interested in those areas. And so ... the reason the, the Federal Prison Bureau uh, job was important to her, because she thought that was the stepping stone in getting into the FBI. |
Gary Condit, August 23, 2001
Interviewed by Connie Chung
Chung did not challenge Condit’s statements about Levy’s apparent desire to become an American spy.
Question # 4:
Why has Washington, DC Police Chief Charles Ramsey not been forced to resign over Levy’s disappearance and subsequent "death"? Ramsey made devastating public statements against Condit without providing supporting evidence. Ramsey stated that Condit had not cooperated with the authorities in its investigation of the disappearance of Chandra Levy. Not only was this an apparent lie, but a brazen one at that. Hard evidence now indicates that Ramsey’s so-called investigation was a figment of his imagination. Ramsey et al botched the so-called investigation by not recovering Levy’s body which was eventually found (at least that’s what we’re told by a gang of Jewish journalists and Jewish DC medical examiner, Dr. Jonathan Arden) in a place that should have been easy to find. On May 22, 2002, the skeletal remains of Chandra Levy were found scattered on a steep, forested slope, near a joggers trail in Rock Creek Park—a well-known area in Washington, DC.
Finding Levy’s remains should have been a no-brainer. How could the police have missed it for a year? Why does Chief Ramsey still have a job? Given his reckless statements about Condit, which ultimately cost Condit his Congressional seat, the only honorable thing for Ramsey to do at this point is fall on his sword and resign. Here is Condit’s explanation to Connie Chung of how he cooperated with authorities despite what Ramsey said to the contrary:
|
CHUNG: The police even said that you impeded the investigation. They do not believe that you have fully cooperated. In fact, the word from the police is that your lack of candor impeded the investigation. CONDIT: Well, I'm, I'm confused if you're making reference to Chief Ramsey's latest comments. Let me tell you, Connie, I have interviewed four times. I interviewed with the Metropolitan police department. I've interviewed a second time with the Metropolitan police department and the commander. I interviewed with the Department of Justice, the federal prosecutor, also with the MPD. I interviewed with the FBI. I allowed them to search my home, where they ripped up my carpet, they took the paint off the walls, they put the drains down the, the pipes. |
Excerpt from Connie Chung interview with Gary Condit, August 23, 2001
In retrospect, Condit’s explanation seems more credible than Ramsey’s entire investigation of Levy’s disappearance. At best, Ramsey is incompetent. At worst, Ramsey is guilty of high treason for conspiracy to assist the 9-11 terrorists (the Israelis) by preventing an elected official from protecting the US Government from foreign attack. This was what Condit was tasked to do on the intelligence committees to which he was assigned by the House leadership.
Question # 5:
Why did it take a week for the authorities to determine that Levy’s "death" was a homocide? What other possibility was there? Did she slip and fall while jogging, killing her instantly? Did she have a heart attack? The entire story of Levy’s death is simply not believable from beginning to end.
The only truthful thing reported by the media about the Levy case is that Gary Condit’s political career was destroyed as a result of it.
I do not claim to have all the answers yet, but someone needed to raise these questions about the railroading of Gary Condit and Bush’s flip-flopping on Republican values which are being substituted by his Socialist Homeland Security agenda. ª
Here is a breakdown of the House intelligence committees:
In the 107th Congress, Gary Condit has served on three of those four intelligence subcommittees, and is the ranking Democrat of the Subcommittee on Intelligence Policy and National Security. The only intelligence subcommittee on which he does not serve is the Subcommittee on Technical and Tactical Intelligence.
http://intelligence.house.gov/subcommittees.htm
Salvador Astucia is the author of OPIUM LORDS: Israel, the Golden Triangle, and the Kennedy Assassination. (the book that solved the mystery of the Kennedy assassination)
To purchase a copy of OPIUM LORDS for $29.00 (in USA), clear here.
To read it online, click here.
To read new exposé about "pro-Nazi" British Historian David Irving being a Zionist agent, click here.