Moderated Discussion Forum
Oslo Accords, Possible Motive for Zionists to Murder Vince Foster
SUMMARY
This discussion thread—which began on August 15, 2002—reveals new information about the death of Vince Foster. One of the leading participants is [Gary] David Martin (aka, DC Dave; aka, David Martin), author of the 17 Techniques for Truth Suppression. Surprisingly, Martin uses many of these techniques himself—particularly No. 2, "waxing indignant"—in his steadfast defense of Reed Irvine’s Accuracy in Media.
The following new information is discussed:
* The hypothesis is presented that Vince Foster’s murder was sponsored by Israeli fanatics in order to thwart the Oslo Accords. The Accords stipulated the return by Israel of all Arab/Palestinian land taken during the Six Day War in June of 1967. So far, no one has publicly attempted to refute this assertion.
* The principal signatories of the Oslo Accords were Yitzhak Rabin (Israel) and Yasser Arafat (PLO), under the guidance of third-party negotiator, Johan Jorgen Holst (Foreign Minister of Norway).
* The contention is that Vince Foster worked behind the scenes to set up the Oslo Accords. He likely attended secret meetings initiated by Johan Holst. These meetings occurred from April 1993 through August 1993. Foster was killed on July 20th of that year. The Oslo Accords were publicly announced on September 13, 1993.
* The Oslo Accords failed because two of its three principal sponsors died. On January 13, 1994, Johan Holst died of a heart attack. He was 56. Holst was the driving force behind the Accords. His death occurred exactly four months after the Accords were publicly announced. On November 4, 1995, Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated in what appears to have been an Israeli/Likud coup. Rabin was killed when he was on the verge of implementing the Accords. The assassin's mother, Guela Amir, wrote an interesting article about Rabin's murder that appeared in the March 1997 issue of George Magazine. In the article, Amir asserts that her son, Yigal, was goaded into killing Rabin by Israeli intelligence.
* There is strong evidence that Reed Irvine’s Accuracy in Media funded an anti-Clinton propaganda campaign, at the behest of Israel, which began in the fall of 1993 after the Oslo Accords were made public. Irvine’s Israeli-sponsored dirty tricks campaign included the recruitment of lobbyists paid to act as professional Clinton haters. Their mission was to discredit Bill and Hillary Clinton by any means necessary. By doing this, it weakened America’s resolve in support of the Oslo Accords.
* Reed Irvine et al. (AIM) financed Patrick Knowlton’s harassment law suit against the U.S. Government at the behest of Israel. Knowlton’s attorney, John Clarke, was paid by AIM. [Reed Irvine publicly acknowledged this fact on August 29, 2002. See email.] Patrick Knowlton was a "crime scene" witness whose testimony refuted the Government’s official story that Foster had committed suicide. It is likely Knowlton's overall allegation of harassment by the US Government was completely bogus. Several parts of Knowlton's story are simply not believable. (See Slade Farney's comments.)
* Patrick Knowlton would certainly have been a suspect in Foster’s murder had the police conducted a proper investigation. Knowlton reportedly worked as chief of security at the Saudi Arabian embassy, a position that probably required an extensive military/intelligence/police background.
* The objective of Knowlton's claim of harassment, and the ensuing lawsuit, was likely threefold: First, the story was apparently designed to feed the anti-Clinton propaganda campaign. It specifically fed the rumor that the Clintons were thugs who had their enemies murdered. Second, Knowlton's story was designed to fool the American intelligentsia, to turn the intellectual community against the Clintons. The general public was told by the media that Foster committed suicide, but those who did not believe the suicide story would eventually read of Knowlton, if they were inquisitive enough to read alternative explanations by journalists like Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, for example. Third, if Knowlton was in fact Foster's killer, the bogus harassment story provided the perfect cover. In this scenario, the murderer becomes a crime scene witness, then sues the Government for harassment. But he will never be charged because the authorities ruled the murder a suicide.
* It is highly probable that Reed Irvine et al. (AIM) [recruited Gary] David Martin (aka, DC Dave; aka, David Martin) and Hugh Turley to push Patrick Knowlton’s phony case against the US Government. Apparently Martin was also tasked by Irvine to keep tabs on political dissidents in the Washington, DC area. [On August 29, 2002, Reed Irvine publicly admitted that AIM paid Turley about $1,600 for 8 speeches about the Foster case which focused on Patrick Knowlton's involvment therein. See email. On the same date, David Martin denied any association with Irvine, but his comments were filled with contradictions and should therefore be viewed with skepticism. See email.]
* To read the evidence that supports these assertions, click here.