In Defense of Jim Garrison
The thread was originally called "Luke John Helder: Bomber, or Another FBI Patsy?"
From: salvador_astucia@yahoo.com (Salvador Astucia) Newsgroups: alt.war.vietnam,tx.general,talk.politics.libertarian,alt.conspiracy.jfk,alt.journalism Subject: Re: Luke John Helder: Bomber, or Another FBI Patsy? References: <b414f1da.0205081547.3055510e@posting.google.com> <abclvp$h50ac$1@ID-74999.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.188.199.186 "Nigel Brooks??????" <nbrooks@msn.com> wrote in message news:<abclvp$h50ac$1@ID-74999.news.dfncis.de>... > "Salvador Astucia" <salvador_astucia@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:b414f1da.0205081547.3055510e@posting.google.com... > > Luke John Helder: Bomber, or Another FBI Patsy? > > By Salvador Astucia, May 8, 2002 > > > > A compelling argument that Helder is an agent provocateur-patsy. > > > > http://www.jfkmontreal.com/helder.htm > > > > > > Salvador Astucia [Nigel Brooks wrote:] > Sal: > > Without a doubt this is one of the more brilliant trolls that > I've seen in some time. You've taken the time and trouble > to design a website espousing the most ridiculous "conspiracy" > theories I've ever seen. You have even gone so far as to > adopt the allegations made by DA Garrison in spite of the > fact that a jury laughed them out of court. Your lack of knowledge of the Kennedy assassination is painfully obvious. In spite of your efforts to malign Garrison's character posthumously (quite brave for a so-called soldier I might add), the facts he uncovered are solid. Although he lost the trial of Clay Shaw, he accomplished the following: (A) He proved that Clay Bertrand and Clay Shaw were the same person, (B) he exonerated Lee Harvey Oswald, (C) he got the Zapruder film from behind closed doors and released it to the world, (D) he revealed to the public that the Mayor of Dallas, Earle Cabell, was brother to a General Charles Cabell, number two man at the CIA during the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion--and a blood enemy of JFK, and (E) he exposed Louis Bloomfield as the mastermind behind the conspiracy. The latter revelation subtly brought the Jewish conspiracy to the light of day. Here are some facts that I uncovered about Louis Bloomfield, independent of Garrison's research, or any other assassination
researcher for that matter: Chapter 9: Louis Bloomfield, the Assassination Engineer http://www.jfkmontreal.com/bloomfield.htm Bloomfield Photogallery: http://www.jfkmontreal.com/intro_to_bloomfield_gallery.htm You can raise holy hell about a silly court case all you want, but the facts are still verifiable in spite of that. Garrison himself wrote, "History has a way of changing verdicts." Nothing could be truer. Readers can read the following chapters which deal with Garrison's evidence, then judge for themselves: Chapter 3, The Importance of Jim Garrison http://www.jfkmontreal.com/importance_garrison.htm Chapter 6, Other Garrison Findings http://www.jfkmontreal.com/other_garrison.htm > Following a relatively meek introduction to this newsgroup, > you allowed those who were hungry for the bait to bite. > The quoting of Kipling was absolutely genius, and taking > a current event and weaving it into a conspiracy involving > some awv posters is absolutely brilliant. > > It is a troll right? > > I mean surely no-one in his right mind could actually > believe this shit. Again, you can attempt to malign my character all you want, but the facts I presented in my book are completely verifiable. Therefore, my character is a moot point. It would be different if I were an eye-witness to a crime. But documented facts are either accurate or not. This is not a complicated concept. You should allow readers to judge for themselves. I only began posting on this newsgroup because I wanted to post an article about Robert Caro's book about LBJ, and I had observed that others before me had discussed Caro on this same forum. You guys should allow readers to read the facts presented without creating such a smokescreen. The mere fact that you guys posted so many articles in opposition to my relatively tame posting about Caro bespeaks more than anything I could ever communicate about the hidden agendas of you and your "buddies" at this point. If my book is nonsense as you claim, the readers can decide that for themselves. They do not need you to interpret things for them. So let's give the readers a chance, okay? This is my article about Robert Caro and his biography about LBJ, Master of the Senate. http://www.jfkmontreal.com/caros_book.htm This is article about Luke John Helder, the alleged mail bomber. It also contains quotes from three members of your newsgroup: Bill Clarke, Bill Langston, and Don Thompson. http://www.jfkmontreal.com/helder.htm This is my article which challenges the honesty of the FBI regarding the mail-bombings in spite of Helder's confession: http://www.jfkmontreal.com/helder_confession.htm This is my 400-plus page book, Opium Lords, which solves the JFK assassination once and for all. http://www.jfkmontreal.com Best regards, Salvador Astucia Author of Opium Lords http://www.jfkmontreal.com