By Salvador Astucia , May 9, 2002

Accused bomber Luke John Helder has reportedly confessed to planting 18 bombs in five states during a weekend "cross-country spree." This information has been reported by CNN wire service and other media outlets. For the sake of discussion I will assume that the confession is true, although American media outlets have demonstrated time and time again that they will push false cover stories in order to help the government falsely convict innocent people of various political crimes. Americans should always remember this when reading media coverage of political or sensational crimes. Americans should also remember that the American news media is dominated by a small group of people who openly break vows via an annual ritual prayer known as the Kol Nidre. But again, for the sake of discussion, I will assume that Helder did in fact confess to the bombings as the Kol Nidre followers assert.

Yesterday (May 8, 2002) I wrote a story entitled Luke John Helder: Bomber, or Another FBI Patsy? His confession—assuming of course that the media is telling the truth—indicates that he was not a patsy per se. But it does not explain how the FBI knew he was a prime suspect in the first place. Helder may in fact be guilty of planting some or all of the bombs. The main point of my original article was this: How did the FBI know to target Helder when the Internet is filled with people who write things far worse?

All Helder did to arouse suspicion was to send an odd letter to his college newspaper. From what I've read, the letter was the main piece of evidence that made the authorities believe he was the perpetrator. I demonstrated in my article that his letter was not nearly as violent as some of the postings on Internet newsgroups. Why was Helder singled out solely because of his letter.

Here’s reality: The US government has provocateurs all over the country that can be manipulated into committing crimes that work to the government's advantage. If the FBI decides we need to wage a war against terrorism, then some of their "robots" will commit a few acts of terrorism. This approach was used with Lee Harvey Oswald, except in his case, he was completely innocent. In 1995, this approach was used by right-wing factions in Israel to assassinate Yitzhak Rabin when he was on the verge of enforcing UN Resolutions 242 and 338 via the Oslo Accords. The use of provocateurs to commit political crimes, or be blamed for the crimes of others, is a sick public relations game. That is the only way to explain how the FBI cracked the case so quickly on such a flimsy lead. ª

FOOTNOTE: CNN wire service reported, on May 8, 2002, that the sheriff of Washoe County, Nevada (where Helder was arrested and jailed initially) is named Dennis Balaam. This is interesting because Balaam is the code name for Jesus in the books of the Talmud. There are numerous references to Balaam throughout the Talmud which are apparently blasphemous references to Jesus. In addition, the Talmud has numerous passages that mock and belittle Christians. It appears that there may be a connection between Sheriff Balaam’s arrest of "Luke John" Helder, Israel’s siege of the Church of the Nativity, and the recent sex scandals within the Catholic Church. It is highly plausible that these three events may being part of a Jewish war against Christianity. Similar efforts led to the expulsion of Jews from virtually every country in Western Europe throughout the Middle Ages. With the recent revelations about Jewish involvement in the Kennedy assassination and 911, it appears that such an expulsion could occur again in the near future.