Rethinking John Lennon’s Assassination

Contents

Lennon Home Page

Main Home Page

 

The FBI’s War on Rock Stars

By Salvador Astucia

 

PART III: PRIMAL SOUNDS

Chapter 6: The Second Insurgency

 
(L-R: Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, John Lennon, George Harrison)

The Beatles, as they looked when playing clubs in the Reeperbahn, a redlight section of Hamburg, Germany. (Original drummer Pete Best is shown on far right.)

Lennon and the Beatles lead the British Invasion

The 1960s brought in a second wave of musical creativity that rejuvenated rock ‘n’ roll of the 1950s. Elvis had joined the army, was stationed in Germany, returned to the states and tried to pick up where he left off, but the momentum was gone. President John F. Kennedy was elected president of the United States. Inaugurated at the age of 43, he was the youngest president in American history. He and his beautiful wife Jackie and their two young children—Caroline and John, Jr. (John-John)—brought a sense of hope and optimism to America. Tragically President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963. About two months later, on February 7, 1964, a rock ‘n’ roll quartet from Liverpool, England came to New York City and appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show. Their music and their image took the world by storm. The Beatles’ leader, John Lennon, assumed the de facto role of king of rock ‘n’ roll, replacing Elvis. The Beatles were influenced by their rock ‘n’ roll predecessors of the Fifties—especially Elvis, Carl Perkins, Buddy Holly, and Little Richard—plus Scottish skiffle singer Lonnie Donegan. Skiffle was a form of bluegrass and folk music—jug band music—that gained popularity in England during the Fifties. Although rock ‘n’ roll had been stopped cold in America, vinyl recordings of the genre flourished in Europe, particularly in port cities like Liverpool, Manchester, and Hamburg, where limited supplies of rock ‘n’ roll and R & B records were quickly bought and hoarded by young British disciples of Elvis. By combining rock ‘n’ roll with skiffle, a new sound developed in Liverpool called the Mersey Beat. The success of the Beatles spawned the success of other British bands such as the Dave Clark Five, the Rolling Stones, the Zombies, the Kinks, Chad & Jeremy, the Searchers, Gerry and the Pacemakers, Them, the Spencer Davis Group, the Who, the Moody Blues, Peter & Gordon, and countless others. The phenomenon became known as The British Invasion.

The Beatles were the first rock ‘n’ roll "group" where there was no solo artist who fronted the band, the so-called rock star. They were a four-piece band that played their own instruments, and sang and wrote their own music. The concept of the group—as opposed to the solo artist—became the dominant trend of Sixties rock. This was one aspect of the British Invasion that was quite different from Elvis Presley’s rock ‘n’ roll of the Fifties.

While Memphis, Tennessee—home of Elvis and location of Sun Records—is considered the Mecca of Fifties rock ‘n’ roll, a comparable location for British rock of the Sixties was a red-light section of Hamburg, West Germany called the Reeperbahn, where prostitution was legalized and drugs and violence were commonplace. Bruno Koschmider, owner of the Kaiserkeller (night club), hired English guitarist Tony Sheridan who became the Reeperbahn's first rock star, but was soon lured away by a rival club, the Top Ten. To meet the market demand for rock ‘n’ roll, Koschmider used of the direct ship route to Liverpool to transport inexpensive rock ‘n’ roll acts from that city, including Billy J. Kramer, the Searchers, Gerry and the Pacemakers, the Swinging Blue Jeans and, most famously, the Beatles. Musicians were housed in slum apartments, fed amphetamines to keep them going, and made to play exhausting schedules. Because of the drugs and violence in the Reeperbahn clubs, waiters often carried tear-gas pistols and blackjacks, which were sometimes issued to bands as well. Although the working standards were extremely grueling, the endless sets transformed the amateurish bands from Liverpool groups into professional musical acts.1

The Dave Clark Five
The Rolling Stones
Them (featuring Van Morrison)
The Kinks
The Zombies
The Who
The Moody Blues
Chad & Jeremy Peter & Gordon The Spencer Davis Group
 

Liverpool club owner and promoter Allan Williams claims the importance of Hamburg to the Beatles’ development cannot be underestimated. "I think it is recognized now," he explained, "that without Hamburg we’d never have had the Beatles. Hamburg was the training ground for the band."2 Years later, George Harrison reflected on the Beatles’ experience playing at the Hamburg’s Reeperbahn in the early Sixties.

HARRISON: In my opinion our peak for playing live was in Hamburg because at that time we weren’t famous. So the people who came to see us were drawn in by the music or by whatever atmosphere we created. Also, at that time, with us being from Liverpool, it was a big scene because people would always say, "You’ve got to be from London to make it." They always thought we were hick or something. But when we played in Hamburg, they kept wanting us back because we would pull in lots of people.

We first went to a place called the Indra, which was shut down. Then we went to the Kaiserkeller, and then the Top Ten, which was probably the best club on the Reeperbahn. At that time it was really fantastic. There was echo on the microphones and it was really a gas. So we’d go in there and spend afternoons rooting through all those old songs like, you know, "Money," and all the sort of tunes that weren’t popular particularly but were quite heavy. We’d do all those ones by Chuck Berry and Little Richard, all the rock ‘n’ roll things. We just kept doing that, even though that sort of period had died out.

The Hamburg days, in retrospect, were probably the most important times of our lives because it was what you could call our apprenticeship. We worked very hard and we worked long hours. We played for eight hours a night, seven days a week for over four and a half months on our first go-round there. We really got a lot of material down, a lot of material we would never have learned if we hadn’t gone there. It was one great rehearsal and it really got the group going. Yes, those days were very important to the Beatles.3

Stuart Sutcliffe’s* widow, Astrid Kirchherr, described the Reeperbahn and the first time she saw the Beatles:

Kirchherr: Hamburg has got an area called the Reeperbahn, and it’s just nightclubs. In the early 1960s there were strip clubs, prostitutes, and the whole bit. So if you were born in Hamburg as I was, and lived there all your life, it wasn’t a place to go for a young girl. I think I’d been to the Reeperbahn once before I went with Klaus [Voorman]. I was pretty frightened when he asked me to go. It took me a couple of days to really make up my mind and agree to go there. We both weren’t very comfortable the first couple of times. My English was very poor, just school English. I had little experience talking to English people. I was very shy, as well, and frightened of making mistakes.

Klaus first introduced me to Stuart. He knew Stuart by then because he had been to the club three or four times before he took me. I didn’t converse with the Beatles the first time, but I immediately thought how wonderful they were and how much I would like to really get to know them. For me seeing them was like a dream come true. I was always longing to take pictures of boys who looked like them, but I had never met any before. I was very nervous and excited, and very young and innocent, but my whole life changed in a couple of minutes. All I wanted was to be with them and to know them.

I had never seen performers like them before. I was into jazz and classical and, of course, a bit of Nat King Cole and the Platters. Don’t forget, in the late 1950s and the beginning of the 1960s, anything that came from the States or from England was far away. The only thing we could get hold of was music from France, like chansons, and a lot of French movies. I’d heard rock ‘n’ roll before because I’d been to England once and had loved it. I really, really loved it, but I’d never seen it performed onstage. It was like a merry-go-round in my head—seeing the Beatles perform and liking them as people. They looked absolutely astonishing.4

Allan Williams was the first Liverpool promoter to book local bands in Hamburg, mainly because there was a huge demand for rock ‘n’ roll in the German city, plus Liverpool was saturated with bands at that time. Williams had a club in downtown Liverpool called the Jacaranda, where bands played in the basement. This was where he first met the Beatles.5 Williams eventually booked the Beatles in Hamburg, as he described below in an interview years later:

WILLIAMS: The scene in Liverpool was swinging, and there were about 300 groups playing in church halls, town halls, and clubs. I had a steel band working in the basement, a calypso band, rather, and they went over to Hamburg. Apparently, with Liverpool being a seaport, some German seamen came and told the band that they would get plenty of work in Hamburg. So off they went. By the way, they didn’t even tell me. I just went down there one night and there was no steel band. They wrote to me about a month later because they knew I was promoting, as well, and they said, "Why don’t you come over here and look at the scene? It’s exploding. There’s plenty of work for your bands." So off I went to Hamburg with a character called Lord Woodbine, who was also in a steel band….We found this club called the Kaiserkeller [owned by Bruno Koschmider]. The next think I knew, I was exporting all the Liverpool groups over there.6

Bigger than Elvis

On December 10, 1961, the Beatles met Brian Epstein and Alistair Taylor at the Casbah Club in the basement of Pete Best’s home.* The Beatles quickly decided to sign a management contract with Brian representing the band. Brian began telling people the Beatles would be bigger than Elvis. Brian’s brother, Clive Epstein, liked the Beatles, but had trouble believing Brian’s prophesy. The following are Clive Epstein’s comments from an interview years later:

CLIVE EPSTEIN: I always thought the Beatles were intriguing, but obviously it was difficult for me to accept what Brian said when he played their tapes and then announced that these guys were going to be bigger than Elvis Presley, who in those days was the giant of them all. I mean, I must be honest about this, I really took his remarks with a pinch of salt. Although I was involved with them on a business basis, I couldn’t accept what Brian said because it seemed quite extraordinary.7

Brian quickly changed their image, having them appear in stylish suits instead of the black leather jackets and jeans they wore at the Reeperbahn clubs in Hamburg. Brian knew that conquering America was much different from playing the Reeperbahn. America was more conservative, more naïve in many ways. Becoming popular in the United States would require a complete make-over. The following is Brian’s description of the Beatles’ image change:

BRIAN EPSTEIN: It was a decision by the five of us to change the Beatles’ presentation. I encouraged them at first to get out of leather jackets and jeans. I wouldn’t allow them to appear in jeans after a short time. After that stage I got them to wear sweaters onstage and then, reluctantly, suits. The distinctive Beatle suits were actually their idea, which they’d seen in Germany. It was a French design by Pierre Cardin. I strongly agreed with their choice and of course, it became rather overworked in the media. Later they stopped wearing them because they became tired of them.8

Although it has been widely reported that John Lennon objected to Epstein’s shift in the band’s image, particularly wearing suits and ties, he obviously enjoyed certain aspects of the image change. Not only did they change the look of the clothes they wore, they also changed the image of the instruments they played. John apparently liked the black Gretsch guitars George Harrison was using in 1962, so he decided to spray paint his blond colored Rickenbacker 325 black as well. The spray paint job was done by Charles Bantam, a man who normally painted coaches. The job was arranged by Chris Whorton, a small-time dance promoter in Birkenhead, a suburb of Liverpool across the Mersey River. The following is Whorton’s description—from an interview years later—of the how Lennon’s Rickenbacker 325 was painted black in 1962:

Chris Whorton: I don’t know how it came up in conversation, but John wanted his guitar painted black, and I offered to get it sprayed for him. I worked for my father who had a meat haulage business in Birkenhead, with plenty of lorries. So we got Charles Bantam, who painted my father’s wagons, to spray the guitar. The Rickenbacker was natural-wood colored, and had a gold colored panel which we left alone. When I took it back I’d put the control panel back the wrong way and he made a bit of a fuss about it. But John didn’t pay me, it wasn’t necessary to pay me, it was done as a favor. Bantam was a perfectionist. He used Tekaloid black coach paint, and did the job at his garage in Birkenhead. It took three days because we had to let the paint dry.9

 
     
   
  The Beatles, Ed Sullivan Show, Feb. 9, 1964  
     
 

Capitol Records and the Ed Sullivan Show

An often overlooked aspect of the Beatles’ success is they had recorded continually with Parlophone Records—EMI’s British record label—since September 4, 1962 when they recorded "Love Me Do." This was a year an a half before they performed on the Ed Sullivan Show for the first time on February 9, 1964. By the time "I Want To Hold Your Hand" was released in America on December 26, 1963, and quickly went to Number One, the Beatles had already recorded scores of songs that sold well in England. Even with the Beatles’ success in the UK, EMI’s American subsidiary, Capitol Records, refused to release or promote Beatle records in the United States. But with the stellar success of "I Want To Hold Your Hand," the Beatles’ appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show, and continual haranguing by Beatles’ manager Brian Epstein, executives at Capitol Records were forced to release Beatle records in America. As a follow-up to "I Want To Hold Your Hand," Capitol Records released a grand total of fifty-five recordings of the Beatles—packaged in five albums—over the course of 1964.* That was a monumental achievement. No one follows up a hit with fifty-five songs. It was unprecedented, and still is. With that one event, the floodgates were opened and the Beatles had made musical history.

Before the Beatles came along, Capitol Records wasn’t interested in bona fide rock ‘n’ roll or rhythm and blues artists. The closest they had were The Beach Boys, The Four Preps, Dick Dale, and The Lettermen. In addition, they offered Tennessee Ernie Ford, Guy Lombardo, Sammy Davis, Jr., Nat King Cole, Al Martino, Buck Owen, Nancy Wilson, Peggy Lee, Judy Garland, and so on. Capitol Records A&R man Dave Dexter claims he tried to get Capitol executives to promote the Beatles, but his efforts were futile. The following is an excerpt from an interview with Dexter where he explains how the Beatles achieved their own success in spite of Capitol Records, not because of them:

DEXTER: There were all kinds of stories, and they still float around. I understand that there are now more than 100 books that have been written about the Beatles and how Capitol Records really promoted them in the beginning. Well, the truth is Capitol Records didn’t do anything with the Beatles. The record ["I Want to Hold Your Hand"] came out on December 26, 1963, in America. Our sales and promotion staff didn’t know whether to take me [seriously], since I had constantly cried, "Wolf," so many times before. I’d tell them how big a hit something was somewhere in Europe or whatever, and they didn’t want any more imported records to sell. They were happy enough to sell the Beach Boys, Nat King Cole, and a few others. So without any promotion the Beatles were an absolute phenomenon. By New Year’s [1964] the orders for "I Want to Hold Your Hand" were in the millions, and there had been no promotion that first week! The only thing I can remember was that the old Huntley-Brinkly news hour showed a little short [piece] about how hysterical Beatle fans were over in England. That might have caused a little stir, but by the first week of 1964, we were hiring RCA Victor and other record labels to press [discs]. Later, when the Beatles were in Florida, I called them to see if they liked the sound of the Capitol issue—we changed some of the sound characteristics from the British Parlophone record—and they assured me the sound was even better, [that it had] a hotter sound and a little more volume.10

While Brian Epstein was pushing to get Capitol to release and promote Beatle records in America, Ed Sullivan and his wife witnessed throngs of teenagers awaiting the Beatles’ arrival at Heathrow Airport in London. The following is Ed Sullivan’s recollection of how he first discovered the Beatles:

SULLIVAN: For years we visited London, and on one of our visits to England in late 1963 we couldn’t believe all the commotion at Heathrow Airport when we arrived. Mrs. Sullivan and I were literally besieged by thousands of youngsters. I asked them what celebrity was arriving. Was it a member of the royal family? I asked some people who worked at the airport, and they told us these hundreds of teenagers were awaiting the Beatles. And as I was always on the lookout for new acts for my program, I decided the Beatles would be a good TV attraction, and also a great news story for our show. So I contacted their manager, Brian Epstein, and agreed to pay them a fee of $10,000 for three shows plus five round-trip airplane tickets and all their expenses for room and board while in America.11

On February 7, 1964, the Beatles arrived at JFK Airport in New York City, landing at about 1:30 PM. More than 10,000 screaming teenagers12 were waiting at the airport for their arrival. Even the Beatles were surprised at the reception. George Harrison described his feelings, years later, as the Beatles landed at JFK Airport on that historic day:

HARRISON: We had heard that our records were selling well in America, but it wasn’t until we stepped off the plane in New York that we truly understood what was going on. Seeing thousands of kids there to meet us made us realize how popular we were there. We thought we could go shopping for records and things, but we couldn’t. Some people gave us records, though. I know our sound was new and the American people were ready for something new. We looked funny and different with our hair. You really can’t pinpoint one particular thing. People called our music, or our sound, the "Liverpool Sound." But we didn’t like the term, because the only reason it was called the Liverpool Sound was because the British press was looking for a name it could peg us with. They didn’t think it was rock ‘n’ roll and they didn’t think it was American rhythm and blues, so they called it the Liverpool Sound. We didn’t believe our sound was different enough as a sound. As far as were concerned, we began performing rock ‘n’ roll and rhythm and blues material and our songs incorporate those elements. That’s really what happened.13

Ed Sullivan was genuinely surprised at the hysteria over the Beatles’ arrival in America. The following are his recollections about the Beatles’ first performance on his show:

SULLIVAN: The Beatles first appeared on our show on February 9, 1964, and I have never seen any scenes to compare with the bedlam that was occasioned by their debut. Broadway was jammed with people for almost eight blocks. They screamed, yelled, and stopped traffic. It was indescribable. And on that same bill with them were the comedian Frank Gorshin, Tessy O’Shay, and the youngsters from the Broadway hit of the day, Oliver! There has never been anything like it in show business, and the New York City police were very happy it didn’t and wouldn’t happen again.14

The Beatles manager, the late Brian Epstein, described how he always had confidence that the Beatles would make it in America, and felt "I Want to Hold Your Hand" was exactly right for the American market in late 1963, early 1964. The following is Epstein’s description of how that particular song was released on the eve of the Beatles first performance on the Ed Sullivan Show, two events which ensured the group’s success in America. The following are Epstein’s comments:

BRIAN EPSTEIN: Obviously I thought about America in connection with the Beatles for a long time because I was always quite sure, really, that the Beatles would make it over there. We were all rather unsure, however, about it because we seemed to be issuing the records and nothing much was happening. I went over the first time to have a look around and see why the records were having no success and to try to get a sense of the American market. I also took with me one of my other artists, Billy J. Kramer, to do some promotional work, which I thought would be a good idea. And both worked quite well actually. As far as seeing what was the matter, I think it was very simple. My answer to the boys when I got back was that I didn’t think we had yet produced a record that was quite right for the American market. I did think, after having listened to a lot of American music and getting a sense of what was popular over there, that "I Want to Hold Your Hand," which was just about to be released, was the right one. Plus [there was] the fact that a lot of information had filtered through from the British press from the Royal Command and the Palladium shows and the scenes in London and Beatlemania in general. There was great interest, and it was just the right moment for the interest of "I Want to Hold Your Hand." I can’t say I timed it for that moment, but it was right. Going over for those Ed Sullivan shows couldn’t have been more right, too.15

The Beatles’ tremendous success in America opened the door for numerous British bands. Over the next two years, from 1964 through 1966, British artists dominated the American charts. The following is a listing of some of the songs and the artists who recorded them:

Band/Artist Song(s)
Animals House of the Rising Sun; We Gotta Get Out of This Place; It's My Life
Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas From a Window; Bad to Me
Chad and Jeremy A Summer Song
Dave Clark Five Glad all Over
Dusty Springfield Wishin' and Hopin'
Freddie and the Dreamers I'm Telling You Now
Gerry and the Pacemakers Ferry 'Cross the Mersey
Herman's Hermits Something Good; Can’t you Hear my Hearbeat?
Hollies Bus Stop
Kinks You Really Got Me; All Day and All of the Night
Manfred Mann Doo Wah Diddy
Moody Blues Go Now
Peter and Gordon World Without Love
Rolling Stones [I Can't Get No] Satisfaction
Spencer Davis Group (featuring Steve Winwood) Gimme Some Lovin'
Them (with Van Morrison) Here Comes the Night
Wayne Fontana and the Mindbenders The Game of Love
Who Can't Explain
Yardbirds Heart Full of Soul
Zombies She's Not There; Tell Her No

In the summer of 1964, the Beatles released their first film, A Hard Day's Night, which was praised by movie critics and analyzed and copied by young American musicians. Consequently, in 1965 American bands began to emerge with a similar sound and image as the Beatles. Such bands included the Byrds, The Lovin’ Spoonful, The Young Rascals, The Beau Brummels, the Outsiders, Jay and the Americans, Paul Revere and the Raiders, and others. Folk singer Bob Dylan went electric and began touring with a backup band that would later perform as The Band, featuring Robbie Robertson. In addition, the Beach Boys intensified their creative endeavors in order to compete with the Beatles. With the exception of Dylan, most of the rock music being created in 1964 and 1965 was very positive, dealing mostly with teenage love and good times in general.

 
     
 
The Supremes   Otis Redding James Brown Marvin Gaye
         

The Segregated Sixties

The Beatles were influenced by black rhythm and blues artists such as Barret Strong (Money), Smokey Robinson and the Miracles (You Really Got a Hold on Me), The Marvelettes (Please Mr. Postman), The Donays (Devil In His/Her Heart), The Isley Brothers (Twist and Shout), Arthur Alexander (Anna). It’s ironic that pop music became so segregated in the Sixties; moreso than the Fifties. As previously stated, musical segregation was quite pronounced in the Sixties, despite the social integration which occurred during that period, and despite the obvious black roots present in the Beatles’ early recordings. Although Capitol Records were forced to release Beatle albums, they and other record companies ensured that musical integration would not occur. Consequently, there was music for blacks, generally called Soul music, and music for whites, generally called rock. Musical segregation did not exist in Fifties rock ‘n’ roll, at least not the extent it did in the Sixties. This is why black artists like Chuck Berry could get away with playing semi-country songs like "Maybellene."

 
Berry Gordy  
 
Aretha Franklin  
     
  In the Sixties, only a few acts managed to successfully cross over, but most maintained separate fan bases. A large amount of the Sixties’ soul music was produced by Berry Gordy of Motown Records, based in Detroit, Michigan. One has to wonder what motivated Gordy to segregate his music so dramatically. The Fifties phenomenon of rock ‘n’ roll demonstrated that people like all kinds of music, regardless of race. Apparently special interests pushed for segregation in the Sixties, and people like Berry Gordy complied. Motown produced some great sounds, but it is interesting how the music industry took a tremendous step backwards in the Sixties by forcing black artists to perform only black sounding music.

Popular Motown bands and artists of the Sixties were Marvin Gaye, Smokey Robinson and the Miracles, the Four Tops, The Supremes, the Temptations, Stevie Wonder, Martha and the Vandellas, and Mary Wells, to name a few. Volt, Stax, and Atlantic offered additional artists. They included Wilson Pickett, Aretha Franklin, Sam and Dave, Booker T and the M.G.s, William Bell, Eddie Floyd, Johnny Taylor, Carla and Rufus Thomas, and the renowned Otis Redding. And of course the "Godfather of soul", James Brown, recorded for P.Funk Records.

 
|    
   
  The Beatles, Shea Stadium, August 15, 1965  
     
 

The Beatles perform at Shea Stadium, 1965

On August 15, 1965, the Beatles began their North American tour at Shea Stadium. That particular performance is considered one of their most famous live shows and a landmark event in rock history. They played before an audience of 55,600 hysterical fans which marked the beginning of "stadium rock." As a result, an entire industry soon emerged to promote live rock bands performing before huge crowds, often playing in sports arenas and stadiums because those venues could hold the largest number of people. The Shea Stadium event was organized by music promoter Sid Bernstein. The Beatles’ old friend Ed Sullivan introduced them.16 On the surface, Shea Stadium was a joyous event, but trouble was brewing behind the walls of power within the United States government.

President Kennedy had been assassinated less than two years prior, shot dead while riding in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas on November 22, 1963. President Lyndon Johnson was aggressively escalating US troops in Vietnam. On August 2, 1964, North Vietnamese patrol boats fired on the U.S. destroyer Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin, and, after President Johnson asserted that there had been a second attack on August 4 (a claim later shown to be false), the U.S. Congress almost unanimously endorsed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution authorizing the president to take "all necessary measures to repel attacks...and prevent further aggression." The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in effect gave the president carte blanche to wage war in Southeast Asia without Congressional approval. This marked the beginning of full-scale American involvement in the Vietnam War.

As the war progressed, the United States government began to persecute anyone who stood in its way, or appeared to have too much power. On December 11, 1964, rhythm and blues singer Sam Cooke was shot and killed in Los Angeles by a motel manager. The circumstances were highly suspicious and the case still unresolved in the minds of many. A month later, on January 20, 1965, Alan Freed—the disc jock/promoter who coined the name "rock ‘n’ roll—died purportedly from complications with alcoholism. A month after that, on February 21, 1965, Malcolm X was shot to death at a rally of his followers at a Harlem ballroom. Three Black Muslims were convicted of the murder. Cooke was reportedly friends with Muhammad Ali (real name, Cassius Clay) and Malcolm X.17

The Beatles’ growing popularity, as demonstrated by their Shea Stadium performance in 1965, was likely viewed by the FBI as a worsening problem. The Bureau had crushed rock ‘n’ roll in the Fifties and was now biding its time to see if the Sixties flavor of the old genre was merely a fad or something more substantial. Shea Stadium revealed that rock ‘n’ roll was completely rejuvenated and would not go away without a strong push. Consequently, the second insurgency of rock ‘n’ roll (also known as the British Invasion) was about to feel the wrath of Big Brother.

 
     

Revolver - The Beatles under attack in 1966

Compelling evidence suggests that, in 1966, Paul McCartney and Capitol Records began to sabotage John Lennon’s music. Four major events occurred from June through August of 1966. Apparently the FBI thought the Beatles were getting too creative and influential. The stated events seemed to center around the release of their next album, Revolver, on August 5, 1966. Although Revolver is considered one of the Beatles’ better albums, and a turning point in their music, I was disappointed with it because—simply stated—the version I heard contained too much McCartney and not enough Lennon.

 
 
Revolver (album cover)    

 

But being an American, I heard the version released by Capitol Records in the United States. Consequently, the version I heard contained three less Lennon songs than the original version (the British version). Revolver was a ground breaking album, signaling a substantial shift in the Beatles’ sound and image. The album cover is avant-garde, designed by German artist Klaus Voorman. The layout is a surreal collage with various photographed images of the Beatles floating on top of hand-drawn images of their heads and faces. Harrison’s hand-drawn face has real eyes and real lips superimposed. In an interview, years later, Voorman described how he was invited to design the cover of Revolver. The following is an excerpt:

KLAUS VOORMAN: Well, it came out of the blue. I wasn’t doing any art in those days. I was playing in bands, and suddenly John [Lennon] called me and said, "Look, Klaus, if you have any idea for our next album cover [Revolver], scribble it down and let us see it. And if it’s something we like, you might get the gig." So I did sketches and I had 10 or 15 suggestions, ideas, but I already liked the one with the hair. I went to the studio, which was always a good idea while they were recording the work, because you needed time to do the cover as much as they needed time to finish the LP. I showed it to them and they all jumped on this idea of the four heads and those little figures.18

The album marked the beginning of the Beatles’ psychedelic period which was introduced by Lennon’s "Tomorrow Never Knows" and Voorman’s cover design. Although none of the songs on Revolver are anti-war, Lennon’s lyrics expanded the boundaries of rock music, which were usually confined to romantic topics. In "She Said, She Said," Lennon stated lyrically that he knows what it’s like to be dead. He later admitted that he simply borrowed a line which was repeated to him by Peter Fonda while Fonda was on an acid trip. Toping off the album’s avant-garde style was George Harrison’s use of the sitar on the song, "Love to You."*

Surprisingly, three of John Lennon’s five original songs did not appear on the version of the album released by Capitol Records in America. Instead, Paul McCartney was presented as the primary creative force. None of McCartney’s songs were omitted from original version of Revolver. Table 2 shows the songs that appeared on the British version of Revolver versus those that appeared on the American version.

Table 2: Revolver - British Version vs. American Version

British version

(Parlophone/EMI)

American version

(Capitol Records)

SIDE 1:

SIDE 1:

1. Taxman

1. Taxman

2. Eleanor Rigby

2. Eleanor Rigby

3. I’m Only Sleeping

(omitted)

4. Love to You

3. Love to You

5. Here, There and Everywhere

4. Here, There and Everywhere

6. Yellow Submarine

5. Yellow Submarine

7. She Said She Said

6. She Said She Said

SIDE 2:

SIDE 2:

1. Good Day Sunshine

1. Good Day Sunshine

2. And Your Bird Can Sing

(omitted)

3. For No One

2. For No One

4. Dr. Robert

(omitted)

5. I Want to Tell You

3. I Want to Tell You

6. Got to Get You Into My Life

4. Got to Get You Into My Life

7. Tomorrow Never Knows

5. Tomorrow Never Knows

On the British version of Revolver, there were 14 songs total; on the American version there are only 11. Again, the three missing songs are Lennon’s. On the British version, Lennon sang lead vocal (and was the primary writer) on five songs: "I’m Only Sleeping," "She Said She Said," "And Your Bird Can Sing," "Dr. Robert," and "Tomorrow Never Knows." On the American version, "I’m Only Sleeping," "And Your Bird Can Sing," and "Dr. Robert" were omitted, leaving only two Lennon songs on the album. Of those two, McCartney refused to play on one. In contrast, five McCartney songs were featured, along with three Harrison tunes. None of McCartney’s or Harrison’s songs were cut from the British version. But Lennon’s three songs were top-notch, far better than some of Harrison’s and McCartney’s songs which were not cut. For example, Harrison’s "I want to Tell You" is a poorly written, poorly arranged song. At best, it’s a mediocre pop tune. McCartney has some nice songs, but "For No One" is a mundane tune which could easily be dropped. Why were those tunes kept and three of Lennon’s were dropped? Again, only Lennon’s tunes were dropped, no others. If Lennon’s three songs were not on Revolver, where did they go?

 
     

Capitol’s fraudulent ‘Yesterday and Today’ album

 On June 15, 1966, Capitol Records released a Beatles’ album without the Beatles’ consent entitled Yesterday and Today. Capitol used a gruesome picture on the cover, known as the "butcher block photo." It showed the Beatles with dead babies (dolls) and hunks of red meat. The butcher block photo was taken during a bizarre photo session with photographer Bob Whitaker. The gory photo was quickly replaced with a more conventional picture of the Beatles.

Some obvious questions arise: Did the Beatles intend to release the "butcher block photo?" If not, how could such a thing occur? My research indicates that the answer to the first question is No, the Beatles did not intend to use the butcher block photo. The answer to the second question is fairly obvious: the FBI was using Capitol Records to harass the Beatles. To understand what happened requires some background information regarding how the Beatles’ recordings were marketed in the UK versus the United States.

From 1964 through 1966, two versions of every Capitol/EMI Beatle album were released: one version was released in Britain on the Parlophone/EMI label; and one version was released in America on the Capitol Records label. Generally, the two versions were similar, but the British versions usually contained about two or three extra songs. In addition, some of the songs were switched between albums.

 
Yesterday & Today - Butcher Block Photo  
 
Yesterday & Today - Conventional photo  
     
 

The British albums, however, were the original versions produced by the Beatles and were intended to be released without alteration in both America and Britain. In an interview years later, John Lennon expressed frustration over Capitol’s practice of changing songs around on Beatle albums sold in America:

LENNON: We would carefully sequence the material, you know, the songs, and have it just the way we felt it should sound for an album. We would put a lot of thought and work into the process and then we’d come over to America…and hear what they had done and it would drive us crazy.19

Some people will argue that the Beatles intended to use the "butcher block photo," but George Harrison stated emphatically, years later, that the Beatles had nothing to do with Yesterday and Today. The following is Harrison’s explanation:

HARRISON: When the American company [Capitol Records] released albums like Yesterday and Today, we didn’t have anything to do with them. They always used to put out more albums in the States than we actually had. In England we’d put 14 tracks on a record and in America they’d put out about 10. Plus, we’d release singles in England and we would never include them on our next album. So if we put out two singles and two albums, they’d convert them to three albums by keeping the extra tracks. So they were different over here. We started to put our foot down when it came to albums like Rubber Soul, Revolver, Sgt. Pepper, and all because it was important that they be the same songs in the States.

Yesterday and Today was a collection of songs from three British albums, plus two singles. Table 1 shows the songs on Yesterday and Today cross-referenced with the British albums and singles where they also appear. Notice how most of songs are from the British versions of Help, Rubber Soul, Revolver, and the A and B sides of a single ("We Can Work it Out" and "Day Tripper"). Also notice that Yesterday and Today was released on June 15, 1966, nearly two months before Revolver was released on August 5, 1966. Yet Yesterday and Today contains three unreleased Lennon songs intended for Revolver. This is extremely odd, and highly significant.

I believe the fraudulent release of Yesterday and Today by Capitol Records served three purposes. First, it made extra money for Capitol by releasing an additional album that the Beatles had never intended to be released. Second, the butcher block photo was intended to weaken the Beatles’ popularity, and frighten the Beatles as well. Third, by pulling three top-notch Lennon songs from the unreleased Revolver, and including the tunes on Yesterday and Today, this would strengthen Paul McCartney’s reputation as a songwriter when Revolver was released. In other words, McCartney looked stronger on the American version of Revolver because Lennon’s contributions were fewer in number. This leads to another troubling conclusion: Paul McCartney was apparently an active participant in a conspiracy with Capitol Records to discredit John Lennon and the Beatles in exchange for strengthening his own reputation as a songwriter and performer.

 
     
 

‘Tomorrow Never Knows’ introduces psychedelic rock

Regardless of efforts made to suppress Lennon’s music on the Revolver album, his two songs which appeared on the American version of the LP had a profound impact on rock music, particularly "Tomorrow Never Knows." In 1966 rock music began to shift to a darker mood, reflecting the sentiment of America’s youth toward President Johnson’s escalation of military involvement in South Vietnam. John Lennon sparked quite a bit of creativity with "Tomorrow Never Knows", a song is laced with lyrical reverences to Timothy Leary’s Tibetan Book of the Dead, a book viewed by many as the Bible for LSD users.

Table 1: Origins of songs that appeared on Yesterday and Today

Yesterday & Today

(released June 15, 1966)

British albums/singles where songs first appeared.

  Help

(released Aug. 13, 1965)

Rubber Soul

(release Dec. 3, 1965)

Revolver

(released Aug. 5, 1966)

Single

SIDE 1:

Drive My Car

 

X

   

I’m Only Sleeping

   

X

 

Nowhere Man

 

X

   

Dr. Robert

   

X

 

Yesterday

X

     

Act Naturally

X

     
         

SIDE 2:

       

And Your Bird Can Sing

   

X

 

If I Needed Someone

 

X

   

We Can Work It Out

     

X

What Goes On?

 

X

   

Day Tripper

     

X

To my knowledge, Tomorrow Never Knows was the first psychedelic song ever written; the term "psychedelic" meaning a song that was inspired by LSD. The lyrics to Tomorrow Never Knows are as follows:

Tomorrow Never Knows

 

Turn off your mind, relax and float down stream,

It is not dying, it is not dying

Lay down all thought, surrender to the void,

It is shining, it is shining.

Yet you may see the meaning of within

It is being, it is being

Love is all and love is everyone

It is knowing, it is knowing

And ignorance and hate may mourn the dead

It is believing, it is believing

But listen to the color of your dreams

It is not leaving, it is not leaving

So play the game "Existence" to the end

Of the beginning, of the beginning

Typically, other bands began to follow the Beatles’ creative instincts. In 1967, a San Francisco-based band, Jefferson Airplane, had a hit single, "Somebody to Love," which made dark lyrical references to lies, death, blood and tears. The same year, Jimi Hendrix released another psychedelic song, "Purple Haze," which described an LSD experience. After Hendrix came along, psychedelic rock really went into orbit, but it was Lennon’s Tomorrow Never Knows that served as the launching pad.

McCartney refused to play on ‘She Said She Said’

Paul revealed a stunning bit of trivia in the 1997 book, Paul McCartney: Many Years From Now, by Barry Miles. Paul stated that he did not play on Lennon’s song, "She Said She Said" on the Revolver album. The following is an excerpt of McCartney’s comments:

It’s a nice one. I like the title "She Said She Said," which I think was made up on the session. John brought it in pretty much finished, I think. I’m not sure but I think it was one of the only Beatle records I never played on. I think we had a barney* or something and I said, "Oh, fuck you!" and they said, "Well, we’ll do it." I think George played bass.20

Not only was McCartney absent on bass guitar on "She Said She Said," studio records further reveal that he did not sing on the recording either. In 1988, Mark Lewisohn wrote a book—The Beatles Recording Sessions—which documented, in detail, the recording sessions for virtually every Beatle song ever recorded. For "She Said She Said," Lewisohn indicates that George Harrison, not Paul, sang tenor backup harmony with John Lennon singing lead vocal. The following is an excerpt from The Beatles Recording Sessions, by Mark Lewisohn:

[21 June 1966] It took just shy of nine hours to record 'She Said She Said', the group spending most of the time rehearsing through at least 25 takes. Then the recording proper began, with three takes of the rhythm track (in this instance drums, bass and two guitars). Take three was the 'best' so the lead vocal (John) and backing (John and George) were overdubbed onto this. A reduction mix vacated one of the four tracks where an additional guitar and organ part (played by John) were soon taped. The song now complete, three mono remixes were done, though none made it onto the finished album--that was remix four, from 22 June.21

McCartney’s absence on "She Said She Said" is significant, especially since the version of Revolver released in America only contained two Lennon songs, whereas the original British/Parlophone version contained five. Of the two remaining Lennon songs, McCartney only recorded on one. This suggests he was part of a conspiracy to weaken Lennon’s popularity in America.

Manila & Lennon’s Jesus remarks

On July 5, 1966, the Beatles were booed and jeered in Manila, the capital of the Philippines. The tumult was caused after the Beatles were erroneously accused of snubbing the president’s wife, Amelda Marcos, by not attending a party she had hosted. Most sources agree that the Beatles never received an invitation, but a false story was leaked that they had been rude to Marcos. As a result, their security was dropped as they tried to leave the country; they were jeered by several people and shoved at the airport by about thirty thugs, many armed.22

On July 29, 1966, Datebook—an American magazine—published John Lennon’s interview with Maureen Cleave which had been published in London’s Evening Standard four months earlier, on March 4, 1966. During the interview, John was apparently feeling quite relaxed with Cleave, and they proceeded to have an intellectual discussion, as opposed to discussing the rock music business non-stop. In the middle of the interview, John made the following remarks about Christianity:

Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn’t argue with that; I’m right and I will be proved right. We’re more popular than Jesus now; I don’t know which will go first—rock ‘n’ roll or Christianity. Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. It’s them twisting it that ruins it for me.23

The British public did not react to John’s remarks about Christianity and Jesus because no spin was added, plus, religion was not the point of the interview. John simply made a few remarks in passing about Christianity. Datebook’s publication of the same article was clearly designed to hurt Lennon. On the front page it said "Lennon was claiming the Beatles were bigger than Jesus." The following is America’s reaction to John’s comments as described by Ray Coleman in his book, Lennon: The Definitive Biography:

American reaction, two weeks before the Beatles were due to begin a long concert tour, was instantaneous and devastating. The Beatles, and particularly John, were denounced as sacrilegious, and a wave of anti-Beatle demonstrations fanned out across the American South, the Bible Belt. The Ku Klux Klan* marched; there were bonfires of Beatles records; and an estimated thirty-five radio stations across America banned Beatles records. The country that had adopted the Beatles as the 1960s’ biggest single phenomenon was rejecting them. Love and hate, those two closely related emotions, had met. The Beatles were bad news, and Lennon’s tongue had caused it.24

Maureen Cleave—the British journalist to whom John made the initial remarks about Christianity—made the following remarks in defense of John’s comments:

MAUREEN CLEAVE: I was astonished that John Lennon’s quotation was taken out of context from my article and misinterpreted in that way. I don’t think for one moment that he intended to be flippant or irreverent, and he certainly wasn’t comparing the Beatles to Jesus Christ. He was simply observing that, to many, the Beatles were better known. He was deploring, rather than approving this. Sectors of the American public were given the wrong impression, and it was totally absurd.25

Brian Epstein met with John in Chicago and urged him to publicly apologize, otherwise the Beatles should cancel their next tour to ensure their safety. Biographer Ray Coleman wrote that "Brian feared the Beatles might be assassinated."26 Upon learning of the possibility of assassination, John broke down and began to cry. "I’ll do anything," he told Brian. "Anything, whatever you say I should do, I’ll have to say. How on earth I going to face the others if this whole tour is called off? Just because of me, just because of something I said, I didn’t mean to cause all of this."27 Coleman made the following remarks which described John’s emotional reaction to the threat of assassination:

Epstein’s mention of death threats made no impact on John personally. This was odd, because to be "level" with a Beatle on such major problems and fears when there was an element of potential trouble was most unusual. All four of them were always protected from grim truths and left alone with the job of being Beatles. For Epstein to tell Lennon of his real worries was a big break with tradition. For John not to react puzzled Brian. He asked John if he realized the seriousness of what he’d said. But it was more what Paul, George, and Ringo would think of him, if a remark by him had caused the danger of cancellation, that bothered John. Here was John’s conscience, exposed for perhaps the first time in his life. He was definitely ready to do whatever was necessary to quell the pandemonium that was gripping America on the subject of the Beatles.28

On August 12, 1966, just as the Beatles’ third American tour was about to begin in Chicago, John held a press conference where he explained his comments about Christianity and apologized. The American journalists were unnecessarily crass. In response, John moved on to other topics and began criticizing America’s warlike conduct in Vietnam. This was the beginning of John’s political activism.29 Things settled down a bit after John’s apology but problems continued to plague the 1966 tour. The Beatles’ public relations manager, Tony Barrow, explained—in an interview years later—how the 1966 tour was a complete disaster. The following are excerpts:

TONY BARROW: I’d been with the Beatles from the start, from 1963. We’d had other people, called press officers or PR aides of one sort or another, who had gone out with the Beatles on the road at various times while I stayed back at home base because we were launching a lot of other acts. But by 1965 I was back on the road with the Beatles again, not just supervising from London but personally setting up and running the press conferences on the road. So I was involved in the last two years of touring, which included what was to me the greatest experience. I won’t call it a concert, but a peak experience of the entire Beatles’ career. That was the Shea Stadium show in 1965. Not the one in 1966. The magic wasn’t quite as thick upon the ground the second time.

1966 was my second year touring and, of course, the Beatles’ last year of touring at all. In fact, 1966 was a horrendous year of one crisis after another. The first of these was Japan when threats were being made by a certain faction, an element among students in Tokyo who reckoned that the Budokan venue the Beatles were going to play at was a sacred place. Sacred to great sporting tournaments of one sort or another and therefore shouldn’t be used for such frivolous purposes as rock concerts. They said that if the Beatles played at the Budokan, the boys would be murdered. I actually managed to determine what was happening from some of the kids down in the Tokyo Hilton foyer. These Japanese kids read the papers to me, which is the only reason I knew about the murder threats. The Beatles never really knew about what was happening. They just saw a lot of armed guards everywhere. They never knew they were under threat of death in Japan.

We then flew straight from there to Manila in the Philippines and, of course, all hell broke loose. This was the second of three major crisis points of 1966 when it was claimed that the Beatles had snubbed the first lady [Imelda Marcos] and failed to turn up to see her at the presidential palace. Of course, one doesn’t snub people like the Marcoses in a territory such as the Philippines. One lives to regret it. Immediately there was an anti-Beatles thing that grew up overnight….

The third and final phase of that horrendous year was the last tour of the United States, where we began with Beatle records being burned and John Lennon under the direct threat of assassination from religious zealots in the southern United States, the Bible Belt states. It was the misconstruing of his comment about Jesus Christ’s diminishing popularity, which wasn’t in any way boastful. It was just a comment he made. By the time it reached certain southern states, it was taken very badly by certain religious factions and there was the threat of death hanging over that whole tour.

I do recall that once we did get down to that area, the southern states, that a firecracker was let off during the concert in Memphis [on August 19, 1966] and everybody, all of us at the side of the stage, including the three Beatles on stage, all looked immediately at John Lennon. We would not at that moment have been surprised to see that guy go down. Of course, that was 14 years too early for that. John had halfheartedly joked about the Memphis concert in an earlier press conference, and when we got there everything seemed to be controlled and calm, but underneath somehow, there was this nasty atmosphere. It wasn’t a happy day at all. It was a very tense and pressured kind of day.30

The end of touring

On August 29, 1966, the Beatles played their final concert at Candlestick Park in San Francisco. They had tired of touring anyway, but it was the fiascoes on their last tour combined with the American news media’s yellow journalism—a practice which forced John Lennon to live under the threat of assassination—that caused the Beatles to stop touring completely. George Harrison played a big role; he had wanted to stop touring anyway and encouraged John to do the same. Paul McCartney was opposed to the decision to stop touring, but Lennon and Harrison won out. Harrison’s most compelling argument was they would have more time to devote to recording if they stopped touring.31 The following are comments made by each of the Beatles, in subsequent years, regarding their decision to stop touring:

GEORGE HARRISON: When we started to get famous and did our own songs more it was very exciting. Then we started doing these big tours and we had to play our records to promote them and sing our hits and stuff. By the time of our last tour, we were in a rut. We just played the same stuff to different people all over the place. It got boring. Nobody could hear us and we felt little satisfaction. We always hated the hotels, the guards, the police escorts, the press, and many other things, but we always loved the fans and performing…Worst of all, we became terrible musicians because we couldn’t hear ourselves and we didn’t really care anymore. Then we got into a big political thing, with all that "bigger than Christ" and Manila and things and I just got sick of it. I think we were nervous wrecks, being flown around everywhere, with press conferences everywhere we went.

RINGO STARR: By the end, none of us enjoyed touring. You couldn’t really. When we started, it was about making good music. That’s why I wanted to be in the Beatles, because they were the best band around. Once you have to go out and play your biggest hits and you’ve got to manufacture it, it doesn’t work. I think of it as the worst time and the best time of my life. The worst part was that 24 hours a day you had press and people fighting over you, as well as fans climbing up and down the drainpipes, trying to get into your rooms, knocking on your windows and doors. It was insane. If it had gone any further, I would have gone crazy.

JOHN LENNON: We’d had enough of performing forever. I couldn’t imagine any reason that would have made us do any sort of tour again. We were all really tired. It did nothing for us anymore. That was really unfair to the fans, we knew, but we had to think of ourselves.

PAUL MCCARTNEY: I remember being frightened many times. As we waited for an armored car to take us to our guarded hotel rooms, I would sit and say to myself, "I really don’t want to go through this any longer. We have the money. Let’s take off for Brighton!"32

After the Beatles stopped touring, they began to explore new avenues of artistic expression. John tried acting, and they continued recording as a group. In 1966 and 1967, a new world emerged as a direct result of their influence. They had become the catalyst for musical, social and political change throughout America and the entire Western world. They had become much bigger than Elvis, something they had never imagined in their wildest dreams a few years earlier. Brian Epstein was the only person to fully realize their potential to outshine the King of rock ‘n’ roll. By 1966, his vision had come true several times over.

 

Go to Next Chapter

Go to Previous Chapter

Contents

Lennon Home Page

Main Home Page

ORDER BOOK

 

http://www.jfkmontreal.com/order_hardcopy.htm

ENDNOTES
 
1 Encyclopedia Britannica: Reeperbahn, The
2 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, p 42
3 ibid, p 51
4 ibid, pp. 47-48
5 ibid, pp. 28-29
6 ibid, p 35
7 ibid, p 186
8 ibid, pp. 186-187
9 Andy Babiuk, Beatles Gear, pp. 73-74
10 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, p 155
11 ibid, p 140
12 Hunter Davies, The Beatles (1996 Edition), p 195. (Davies claims 10,000 teenagers were waiting for the Beatles at JFK Airport, Feb. 7, 1964.)
13 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, p 157
14 ibid, p 151
15 ibid, pp. 158-159
16 ibid, pp. 197-198
17 SOURCES: (1) Encyclopedia Britannica: Malcolm X; (2) Sam Cooke: bio, http://www.history-of-rock.com/cooke.htm; (3) Cooke’s death, http://members.tripod.com/clarkkauffman/id32.htm; (4) Sam Cooke, bio, http://www.samcooke.com/body_biography.html
18 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, pp. 212-213
19 ibid, pp. 206-207
20 Barry Miles, Paul McCartney: Many Years From Now, p 288
21 Mark Lewisohn, The Beatles Recording Sessions, p 84
22 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, p 409
23 ibid, p 404
24 ibid, pp 404-405
25 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, p 218
26 ibid, p 406.
27 SOURCES: (1) Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography: The precise date of Datebook’s publication of Maureen Cleeve’s interview with Lennon (July 29, 1966) is shown on p 700. (2) A detailed account of America’s reaction to the article, and John’s apology, are described in pp 403-409. (3) Fear of an assassination attempt on the Beatles is described in a book: John Lennon: Unseen Archives, by Marie Clayton & Gareth Thomas, p 167.
28 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, p 407
29 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography: Date of John’s press conference (Aug. 12, 1966) is shown on p 701.
30 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, p 224
31 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography: Date of last performance (Aug. 29, 1966) is shown on p 701. The decision to stop touring is described on pp 410-411.
32 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, pp. 226-229