Contents

Lennon Home Page

Main Home Page

 

Rethinking John Lennon’s Assassination

The FBI’s War on Rock Stars

By Salvador Astucia

 

Part IV: The Manson Murders

Chapter 11: What really happened?

 

A likely scenario

In 1968 J. Edgar Hoover’s FBI developed a masterplan to discredit one of the leading forces opposing the Vietnam War: rock musicians in general and John Lennon and the Beatles in particular. The plan was to groom a human voodoo doll of Lennon—Charlie Manson was the perfect choice—and manipulate the voodoo doll and several hippies into committing mass murder; at least make them the patsies. The primary murder victim would be the Gentile wife of a famous Jew who aired his people’s dirty laundry. The Jew in question was Roman Polanski. His crime was making Rosemary’s Baby, a movie that depicted Jews as witches who practiced blood libel, the sacrifice of Christian children in black magic rituals.

Several orthodox rabbis were apparently involved in developing the masterplan because it contains numerous ritualistic, albeit sadistic, symbols. An example is having Sharon Tate murdered at a house where the Beatles stayed several times while touring California. Another example is leaving a carving fork protruding from Leno LaBianca’s stomach and a knife in his throat to match the lyrics of the Beatles’ song, Piggies. Aside from being a gruesome display, it is particularly satanic because the symbol was directed at John Lennon. The song, Piggies, was written by George Harrison, but Lennon helped write the following lines about forks and knives: "Everywhere there's lots of piggies living piggy lives. You can see them out for dinner with their piggy wives, clutching forks and knives to eat their bacon."

The following is a summary of the ten-step masterplan:

Step One: Alert informants in the recording industry—with connections to the Beatles—to find a patsy, a mirror image of John Lennon. Terry Melcher is given a detailed psychological profile and bio of John Lennon and is advised to find someone with genuine talent and charisma who matches Lennon’s profile. Melcher selects Dennis Wilson’s friend, Charlie Manson. Melcher is friends with Beatles’ publicist Derek Taylor, who provides inside information about the Beatles which is passed on to the planners.

Step Two: Begin subjecting Manson Family members to subliminal forms of mind control using sexual manipulation while under the control of LSD and other mind-altering drugs. An unnamed forty-five year-old woman befriends Manson and gives him a standing invitation to the Spiral Staircase, a party house in L.A. where the most devious forms of satanic practices and mind control are performed on unsuspecting victims.

Step Three: Flood the commune with informants. Manson’s small commune rapidly grows. Many are young kids (18 to 25) sewing their wild oats, looking for a good time, and generally trying to find themselves. Many others are FBI informants pretending to be hippies. Suspected FBI informants are T.J. Walleman, Nancy Pitman (Brenda), and biker Danny DeCarlo. Walleman supplied Manson with the gun used to shoot Bernard Crowe, then started the rumor that Crowe was a Black Panther.1 Pitman allowed Tex Watson to eat poisonous telatche/belladonna plants which caused him to loose control of his mental faculties. DeCarlo gave the LAPD and Vincent Bugliosi incriminating testimony about Manson shooting Crowe.2 Record producer Terry Melcher was apparently an FBI informant as well. The reason he gave for backing away from Manson’s record deal was because Manson was "involved in shooting some Negro." (Bernard Crowe)3 How did he know that? No one else seemed to know anything about it, not even the police. As it turned out, Crowe was not dead.

Step Four: Send in two mentally compromised mind control subjects. The FBI sends Susan Atkins (aka, Sadie) and Charles "Tex" Watson to join Manson’s Family. Neither Atkins or Watkins realize they are being manipulated by the FBI, but both have undergone extensive mind-control processing through sexual manipulation, LSD and other mind-altering drugs, hypnosis, and a battery of mind-control programs. The reason for sending in Atkins and Watson is because they can receive and execute detailed mind-control messages much easier than the other less processed commune members.

Step Five: Sheep-dip Manson. Sheep-dipping is an intelligence process in which a person’s image is changed for a desired effect. If someone is going to become the fall guy for a murder, he or she must be tricked into doing incriminating things that can later be used against him or her. Four stages of sheepdipping are used on Manson. First, send subliminal messages to Manson telling him to move deeper into the desert. This is used against him later as part of the bogus Helter Skelter scenario. (Start a race war then hide in the desert.) Second, send subliminal messages to Manson repeating the words "Helter Skelter" and some iteration of the words "race mixing" in a manner associated with moving to the desert. The message is something like this: "Go to the desert; get away from race riots and racial mixing; avoid chaos and helter skelter." Later when Manson explains to his friends why they should move to the desert, he mentions racial issues and uses the words "helter skelter." Third, stage the bogus shooting of Bernard Crowe, then spread the word that he was a Black Panther. The objective is to cause Manson to panic and publicly tell the commune to beware of sniper attacks from Black Panthers and other hostile blacks. Fourth, stage a drug-deal gone bad which results in the murder of drug manufacturer Gary Hinman.

Step Six: Prepare for the hit. Hire real assassins, then use mind control and the power of suggestion to convince the subjects they are guilty of committing mass-murder. This requires a few things happening simultaneously. First, send detailed kill messages to mentally compromised "robots" Susan Atkins and Charles "Tex" Watson. The messages must contain details that match the actual crime scenes. Second, send general kill messages to the others. They don’t need details because they will follow the leads of Atkins and Watson. Third, send in the real assassins to kill the victims. The true assassins must not kill anyone until the patsies are at the crime scene. Fourth, send extremely intense kill messages to the patsies at the same time the murders are occurring. The patsies must see the dead bodies in order to believe they committed mass murder.

Step Seven: Make reality match the cover story. This is done by getting Atkins and Watson—the mentally compromised robots—to repeat the cover story over and over. Since the cover story matches the crime scene it further convinces the patsies that they committed the murders. Of course reality is really an illusion.

Step Eight: Get a couple of the informants to testify against the others. Linda Kasabian and Paul Watkins (Little Paul) were the DA’s primary witnesses. Together they repeated the cover story and linked Family members to the crime scene.

Step Nine: Find an extremely dishonest district attorney to prosecute the Manson Family. Vincent Bugliosi is the perfect choice.

Step Ten: Instruct the media to demonize Manson and his followers before the trial begins.. In addition, the media constantly pushes the cover story. This makes Bugliosi’s job much easier.

‘Paul is Dead’ Rumor

Two months after the notorious "Manson Murders," a bizarre rumor circulated that Paul McCartney was dead. In October of 1969, Russell Gibb, a radio Disc Jockey in Detroit, announced on the air he had received information that Paul McCartney had died several years earlier and it had been covered up with a look-alike. Gibb further claimed the Beatles had placed "clues" in their songs, movies, and album artwork. Newspaper and television reporters picked up the story and Gibb’s rumor quickly spread across America. According to Gibb, McCartney was killed in a car accident three years earlier, in 1966. Understanding the ramifications of such news, the surviving Beatles hatched a cover-up plan. A Paul McCartney look alike contest was held. William Campbell won first place, but the results were never announced. Campbell's prize was to be made a clone of Paul for photos, videos, movies, etc. Plastic surgery was used to smooth out the minor differences. They failed to fix a scar on Campbell's upper lip; this is how you can tell authentic McCartney photos from the Campbell ones.4 This is all Gibb’s theory, of course, not mine.

Today, the Paul is Dead rumor seems ridiculous, but in 1969, many Beatle fans took it seriously. Years later, the Beatles’ producer, George Martin, reflected on the incident:

GEORGE MARTIN: All of a sudden things began to add up. I started to get letters and cards from people outlining how obvious it was that Paul was actually dead. They said that they understood all our clues on the covers over the past few years and, you know, I started believing it myself. They would say, "Look on the back of Sgt. Pepper. He is the only one of the four with his back to the camera, and on Magical Mystery Tour he is shown wearing a black carnation and he’s not wearing shoes on the Abbey Road cover." Little things like that. People read more and more into the things that Paul had done differently than the others. Well, if he was dead, he darn well had a very good impersonator. One afternoon Paul was at my home playing the piano and having some tea. We laughed about all that was happening, but really it wasn’t that funny after a while. Rather sinister, actually, when people start to find your telephone number and call you at three o’clock in the morning, asking you if Paul is really dead!5

Looking back, it seems quite possible that the Paul is Dead rumor was yet another form of harassment by the FBI. The message they were sending was this: "We can take any of you guys out any time, spread any story we want, and the world will believe whatever we tell them."

Lennon believed there was a plot against rock stars

Ray Coleman wrote that John Lennon suspected his immigration problem was part of a plot to weaken the "unity of youth," and prevent future gatherings like Woodstock. The following is an excerpt from Coleman’s book, Lennon: The Definitive Biography:

[John] suspected that his immigration problem might have been part of a wider plan to split the unity of youth which, in the early 1970s, was such a potent force. With Paul McCartney marooned in Britain because of his own drug bust, John afraid to leave the U.S. because he wouldn’t get back in, Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison, two catalysts of the youth culture, dead, and the Rolling Stones being carefully watched, Lennon thought it was perhaps a plot. "They’re chopping off the ‘revolution’ at its source," he said. "So there’ll be no more mass gatherings like the Woodstock peace festival. These things inspire change. Politicians don’t want change, so it’s in their interests to split us all up."

"I’m not the only rock star who’s harassed, but nobody else tried to stay here in America. And nobody else hung out with the baddies like I did. Maybe I’m dumb but I’m interested in people. I wanted to find out what they had to say about everything. I didn’t want to read a book on them, so I met them all to find out where it’s at, y’know. Now in 1968, the cops beat up some at a Chicago convention. I’m discussing with Jerry Rubin, Allen Ginsberg, and everybody what they’re talking about—and they’re saying, ‘Shall we go to San Francisco to have an anti-war rally?’ Next thing it’s in the papers that John and Yoko are going to lead a vast rally in San Diego with all these people!"6

A few years later, John’s instincts about a plot were validated by Senator Frank Church, who revealed an FBI-led plot against people like Hendrix, Morrison, and Lennon. Rock stars were not specifically identified in the renowned Church Committee’s voluminous reports, but they certainly fit the profile of the FBI’s targeted leftist groups, namely black militants and peace activists against US involvement in the Vietnam War. Hendrix was both an antiwar activist and a supporter of the Black Panthers and Martin Luther King. Morrison was one of the most militant anti-Vietnam anarchists of the 1960s. As for Lennon, he "met them all to find out where it’s at."

The Church Committee

In the mid-1970s, Idaho Senator Frank Church conducted a broad investigation of US intelligence agencies. The formal name of the investigative body was the "Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities," more commonly known as the "Church Committee." Although the committee is widely known for uncovering misconduct within the entire US intelligence community, particularly the CIA, a close examination of the Committee’s reports reveal enormous corruption within the FBI and J. Edgar Hoover, who served as the Bureau’s director for 48 years, from 1924 until his death on May 2, 1972.

The Church Committee revealed that in 1967, the FBI launched a campaign to weaken black nationalists. The following is an excerpt from the Committee’s report entitled Intelligence Activities and Rights of Americans - Domestic Covert Action:

The stated strategy of the "Black Nationalist" COINTELPRO [Counter Intelligence Program] instituted in 1967 was "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, or otherwise neutralize" such groups and their "leadership, spokesmen, members, and supporters." The larger objectives were to "counter" their "propensity for violence" and to "frustrate" their efforts to "consolidate their forces" or to "recruit new or youthful adherents." FBI field offices were instructed to exploit conflicts within and between groups; to use news media contacts to ridicule and otherwise discredit groups; to prevent "rabble rousers" from spreading their "philosophy" publicly; and to gather information on the "unsavory backgrounds" of group leaders.7

The Church Committee further revealed that in March 1968, the program against black nationalists was expanded from twenty-three to forty-one FBI field offices, which were instructed to prevent the rise of a black "messiah" who could "unify and electrify" the movement, specifically naming Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Stokely Carmichael, and Elijah Muhammed. Field offices were also directed to prevent black nationalist groups from "recruiting young people." The Black Panthers were hit especially hard. FBI field offices were instructed to develop "imaginative and hard-hitting counterintelligence measures aimed at crippling" the Panthers. The Church Committee further revealed that during 1967 through 1971, FBI headquarters approved 379 proposals for counterintelligence actions against "black nationalists."8

The Bureau labeled anti-war activists as the "New Left" and rationalized that "some of these activists were urging revolution and calling for the defeat of the United States in Vietnam." (AUTHOR’S NOTE: Certainly John Lennon fit the FBI’s definition of the New Left since he wrote a song entitled "Revolution" and staged two bed-ins opposing the Vietnam War.) The following is an excerpt— from the previously mentioned Church Committee—describing how the FBI dealt with the New Left:

Further directives issued soon after initiation of the [New Left] program urged field offices to "vigorously and enthusiastically" explore "every avenue of possible embarrassment" of New Left adherents. Agents were instructed to gather information on the New Left’s "immorality" and the "scurrilous and depraved" behavior, "habits, and living conditions" of the members of the targeted groups. This message was reiterated several months later, when offices were taken to task for their failure to remain alert for and seek specific data depicting the "depraved nature and moral looseness of the New Left" and to "use this material in a vigorous and enthusiastic approach to neutralizing them."

In July 1968, the field offices were further prodded by FBI headquarters to:

1) Prepare leaflets using "the most obnoxious pictures" of the New Left leaders at various universities;

2) Instigate "personal conflicts or animosities" between New Left leaders;

3) Create the impression that leaders are "informants for the Bureau or other law enforcement agencies" (the "snitch jacket" technique);

4) Send articles from student or "underground" newspapers which show "depravity" ("use of narcotics and free sex") of New Left leaders to university officials, donors, legislators, and parents;

5) Have members arrested on marijuana charges;

(AUTHOR’S NOTE: Planting drugs on rock stars during drug busts was a tactic used extensively in the late Sixties. This happened to John Lennon and Mick Jagger, to name a few. Lennon’s well-known London drug bust on October 18, 19689 restricted his ability to enter and leave the United States at will for years. As previously mention, the FBI had an active field office in London for years.10 )

6) Send anonymous letters about a student’s activities to parents, neighbors, and the parents’ employers;

7) Send anonymous letters about New Left faculty members (signed "A Concerned Alumni" or "A Concerned Taxpayer") to university officials, legislators, Board of Regents, and the press;

8) Use "cooperative press contacts;"

9) Exploit the "hostility" between New Left and Old Left groups;

10) Disrupt New Left coffee houses near military bases which are attempting to "influence members of the Armed forces;"

11) Use cartoons, photographs, and anonymous letters to "ridicule" the New Left;

12) Use "misinformation" to "confuse and disrupt" New Left activities, such as by notifying members that events have been canceled.

During the period 1968-1971, FBI headquarters approved 291 counterintelligence actions against the "New Left." Particular emphasis was placed upon preventing the targeted individuals from public speaking or teaching and providing "misinformation" to confuse demonstrators.11

Elliot Mintz linked to Manson Murders

Elliot Mintz was John Lennon’s publicist for several years; he is still the publicist for Yoko Ono, David Crosby, Bob Dylan, and others. Mintz was born February 16, 1945.12 (He is 59 as of this writing, nearly five years younger than Lennon.) Mintz was probably a colleague of Terry Melcher’s. Both Mintz and Melcher had direct connections with the Beatles. They also had direct connections with the Byrds. Both Mintz and Melcher lived in Los Angeles.13 As previously stated, Melcher produced the Byrds’ first two albums.14 Mintz is the publicist for David Crosby, a founding member of the Byrds.15

I have never read that Mintz and Melcher were close associates, or even friends, but given that they both worked directly with members of two of the biggest rock bands in the Sixties, the Beatles and the Byrds, and given they both lived in LA, it is plausible that they may have known each other quite well. I don’t know this absolutely, but the likelihood is quite strong. Ironically, Lennon’s career began to fade as soon as Mintz came became his publicist in 1972. Although John and Yoko apparently trusted Mintz completely, others hold a different opinion. In 2000, Michael Gray published a biography of Bob Dylan, Song & Dance Man III: The Art of Bob Dylan, which was extremely critical of Mintz. Gray quoted Paul Zollo who interviewed Dylan in 1991 for Songtalk magazine. Zollo said Mintz not only sat in on the entire interview, but tried to control the questions asked beforehand and censor Dylan’s answers afterwards. This is what Zollo said about Dylan and Mintz:

Bob made a comment like ‘People will burn their hair just because Jimi Hendrix burned his guitar’ and Elliot wanted it cut out because he thought it offensive to Hendrix. After the interview Bob said he didn’t mean anything against Hendrix and I agreed that it didn’t come off as being negative towards Hendrix, so Elliot agreed to allow it but the next day he called me and said that he and Bob had talked it over and that Bob wanted it left out.

Another time, the part where [Dylan] said he didn’t write lies, he mentioned the songs ‘Feelings’ and ‘People’ as the type of song that he wouldn’t write. He actually started singing them for a few seconds and when he sang the line ‘People who need people are the luckiest people in the world’ he turned and said that that was bullshit… He thought for a few seconds and said that maybe people who needed people were the luckiest people, and laughed. Elliot had that taken out because he thought it would offend the people who wrote the songs… I asked him about ‘Idiot Wind’ and he made the comment that not even Neil Young had written a song like that, not yet anyway. Elliot thought that too would be offensive, to Neil Young…he was in control of the whole scene.16

After quoting Paul Zollo’s description of how Elliot Mintz interfered with the 1991 interview of Bob Dylan, Michael Gray went into what can only described as a rant against Mintz. Here is an excerpt:

Do you often read anything quite so depressing? There ought to be a special hell for people like Mintz who sanitize and demean the very personality of the artist they are supposed to look after. Eternal fire is too good for them. Eternal tape-loops of ‘Feelings’ and ‘People’, maybe.

But that Bob Dylan delivers himself into the hands of these ghouls: that is the disquieting thing, because of what it augurs for his work—because of how it threatens to diminish (aims to diminish) the autonomy of its author, pulling down and intruding upon his ‘lone guitar and a point of view.’

Why does he tolerate such people? As well as Elliot Mintz, the 1980s saw him acquire a ‘dresser’, one Suzie Pullen, to swell his entourage and, for the 1986 tour for instance, to put on his fingerless gloves for him and strap up his over-elaborate boots. Why can’t he put on his own?17

Earlier I asserted that dark forces—someone within Lennon’s inner circle—may have been at play, manipulating events in Lennon’s life as part of a satanic ritual that ultimately ended with his slaying on December 8, 1980. Michael Gray and Paul Zollo gave a damning description of Mintz that make him the prime suspect as Lennon’s number one backstabber. Mintz was Lennon’s publicist for eight years—from 1972 through 1980—but Lennon was in self-imposed retirement for five of those eight years. Mintz may have been an FBI informant assigned to keep Lennon internally confused, on drugs and booze. If so, Mintz was successful for a time in the seventies—during the infamous Lost Weekend—but Lennon triumphed and returned to the public eye in 1980 drug-free, physically fit, and in better emotional and mental condition than ever before.

Elliot Mintz & John Lennon

Mintz maneuvered his way into Lennon’s inner circle by flattering and befriending Yoko Ono. The following is an excerpt from Lennon, by Ray Coleman, which describes how this was accomplished:

Elliot Mintz’s closeness to John developed, curiously, from his association with Yoko. In 1972 Mintz was working as a disc jockey and star television interviewer, well on the road to becoming a Dick Cavett-style commentator; in Los Angeles he reported for Eye-Witness News and had a growing reputation as a penetrating interviewer of statesmen, politicians, and celebrities. When John and Yoko’s controversial album Some Time in New York City was released in June of that year, Mintz conducted a one-hour interview/profile for the radio station KLOS with Yoko, tracing the background to her meeting with John. He asked her unusual questions: whether the people in her dreams spoke English or Japanese, what quotes from her book Grapefruit meant to her, and how she wanted to be remembered when she died. Her answer was, ‘Just say that John and I loved, lived, and died.’ Next day she called to ask for a correction to be taped to that sentence: it was recorded to say: ‘John and I lived, loved, and died.’ …’It was really quite a beautiful interview,’ said Yoko, ‘and we loved the tone of it.’

A few days later about three hundred letters had arrived at Mintz’s office enthusiastically inquiring about the Yoko interview. Hesitantly, Mintz phoned Yoko to tell her about the letters. To his surprise, she was fascinated to hear about every one. And that conversation began a unique telephone friendship between Yoko and Mintz that went on nightly for many months. …With Mintz in California and Yoko in New York, they spoke every night on everything—religion, films, politics, love, death, books, romance. …

Finally, after months of these nightly conversations, John could stand the curiosity no longer. Who was this disc jockey his wife was always talking to? Typically, he decided to get in on the act and did a radio interview with Mintz.

Within months of striking up the telephone friendship, John and Yoko decided to take a car journey across America in their old station wagon, with a driver. … A meeting with the mysterious Mintz was part of the program. When they met him at the house they had rented in Santa Barbara, they presented him with the demonstration record of Some Time in New York City, [released June 12, 197218] the highly charged political album containing ‘Woman is the Nigger of the World’ and a song about Attica State Prison. After spending the day with John and Yoko, Mintz returned to Los Angeles and broadcast the entire album, freezing all commercials and inviting listeners’ reactions. Next day John and Yoko phoned him to ask how it went.

‘I have the good news and the bad news,’ replied Mintz. ‘The good news is that it went great, the bad news is that I was fired.’ The lyrical content of the album had offended the sponsors. John and Yoko thought it was hilarious.

‘My radio career had just collapsed,’ said Mintz, ‘and they just sat there laughing.’

John said: ‘Oh well, now you don’t have a job, you might as well come with us. We’re going up to San Francisco.’ Mintz did just that, spending a month with them at the Miyako Hotel in San Francisco, and from that first meeting he became John Lennon’s close friend and confidant. Lennon trusted him completely.19

It appears that Mintz won Lennon’s confidence in two ways: first, by flattering his wife about her book, Grapefruit; and second, by getting fired from KLOS radio station for playing Lennon’s entire album Some Time in New York City. Let’s step back for a moment. Is it believable that a popular LA disc jockey would get fired for playing a new John Lennon album hot off the presses? Granted, the album was highly political, but John Lennon was a superstar. It doesn’t seem believable that a radio station would fire a rising disc jockey because he played a newly released Lennon album, regardless of the content.

Ray Coleman portrays Elliot Mintz in a positive light. But if we are to believe Paul Zollo and Michael Gray, who painted a darker picture of Mintz, then it is quite possible that Mintz was never fired at all. It is plausible that he made up the entire story about being fired in order to win Lennon’s confidence and ultimately become part of his inner circle, which is precisely what happened.

Luring Lennon to the Dakota

In 1971, John and Yoko moved to New York City to find Yoko’s eight-year-old daughter, Kyoko, from a previous marriage to filmmaker Anthony Cox. Yoko’s ex-husband had suddenly disappeared with their child, thereby denying Yoko legal access to her daughter. Sadly, Yoko missed Kyoko’s entire childhood and the two were never reunited until January 2001, twenty-one years after John’s death, thirty years since Yoko last saw her estranged daughter.20 The following is an excerpt from Ray Coleman’s biography, Lennon, which describes John and Yoko’s search for Kyoko, a pursuit that ultimately led them to New York:

In December 1969 John and Yoko holidayed in Denmark with Anthony Cox, Yoko’s second husband, together with his new wife, Melinda, and Kyoko. Anthony Cox pronounced John ‘a great man’. Everything looked set for harmonious access. But it was not to be easy.

The issue of custody of Kyoko was never properly resolved when Yoko and Tony Cox were divorced, and Yoko expected free access to her daughter. But after an ugly experience in Majorca [Spanish island in W. Mediterranean] in 1971, when John and Yoko were detained by police for a day on suspicion of kidnapping her, Anthony Cox vanished with Kyoko. The search in Marjorca had appalled John and Yoko. ‘How can you kidnap your own daughter?’ said Yoko. Anthony Cox’s evasiveness with the eight-year-old girl was what decided John and Yoko to move to New York. They first visited there in June 1971, believing that Cox had taken the girl into the city. Courtroom appearances and visits to the Virgin Islands, plus private detectives and international publicity, never properly resolved Yoko’s and John’s desire for a peaceful relationship with Kyoko and Anthony Cox. But in September 1971, while they were living temporarily in Manhattan’s St. Regis Hotel in the hope of finding Kyoko, they decided to live permanently in America. Yoko, who knew every corner of the city in which she had grown up in the 1950s, took John walking round it, and he needed little urging to convince him that it was the right environment for an artist….’Yoko and I seemed to be forever coming to New York,’ he explained later. ‘It seemed more functional to come and live here.’21

John and Yoko moved into the Dakota, in Manhattan, in June 1973, less than four years after the Tate-Labianca-Hinman murders, five years after Roman Polanski’s movie Rosemary’s Baby was released, and one year after Lennon hired Elliot Mintz as his publicist. Within three or four months after moving to the Dakota, Yoko asked John to move out; they remained separated for 15 months.22 It would appear that both John’s association with Mintz and moving to the Dakota were both ominous events, quickly turning his life in a negative direction.

Before moving to the Dakota, John was feeling the wrath of America’s Big Brother and was quite aware that the FBI was keeping tabs on him and tapping his phones. The following is Fenton Bresler’s state of mind when he and Yoko moved in the Dakota in June 1973:

…Lennon was left physically and mentally exhausted. As he later explained to his British friend, Anthony Fawcett: " In 1972, it was really gettin’ to me. Not only was I physically having to appear in court cases, it just seemed like a toothache that wouldn’t go away. There was a period where I just couldn’t function, you know. I was so paranoid from them tappin’ the phone and followin’ me."

It did not get very much better. In March 1973, he was again ordered by the INS to leave the country, although they granted Yoko permanent residency. His reply was spirited but weary: "Having just celebrated our fourth wedding anniversary, we are not prepared to sleep in separate beds. Peace and love, John and Yoko." Fighting to stay in the country now became almost a full-time job. Everything else, even the occasional protest demonstration, had to take second place. As Jon Weiner has written, "Along with the feelings of powerlessness and fear instilled by the government came a loss of artistic energy and confidence."

Then, in June 1973, Lennon and Yoko rented the home of Robert Ryan, the actor who had marched with them in the Washington DC "candelight vigil and procession for peace" the previous year and who was now sadly dying of cancer. It was Apartment 72 in an enormous granite-fronted block built in 1884 by the Singer sewing machine millionaire Edward S. Clark. It was then located so far out of town it was given the ironic name of The Dakota…[after the remote mid-Western states] but by the early 1970s it had become one of the most desirable blocks in the city.

Lennon, dispirited and at the lowest of his powers, moved in to what was to prove to be his last and happiest permanent home.23

Bresler’s description of the Dakota as Lennon’s "last and happiest permanent home" is somewhat misleading. Technically the Dakota was John’s permanent residence for seven and a half years, from June 1973 until his death on December 8, 1980; but he left the Dakota and Yoko, at her request, for 15 months—living in Los Angeles—shortly after he moved to the Dakota, hardly the "happy permanent home" which Bresler depicts. In addition, John and Yoko’s decision to move to the Dakota was quite odd, given that Roman Polanski’s movie, Rosemary’s Baby, was filmed there. It’s as though John was made a sacrificial lamb in a sick game played by a satanic cult group. How could have been manipulated in such a manner? This sort of treachery is best pulled off if spies are sent in to befriend the targeted individual. The spies work together without the target’s knowledge, enabling them to move get desired actions from the target at will. There were four suspicious characters in John and Yoko’s respective lives who might have manipulated them into moving to the Dakota as a contingency plan for assassination. They were Yoko’s second husband, Anthony Cox; a hypnotist friend of Cox’s named Don Hamrick; primal screaming therapist, Arthur Janov; and Lennon’s publicist Elliot Mintz.

Anthony Cox reportedly belonged to The Walk, a religious cult involved in psychic and borderline occult practices.24 Prior to disappearing with Kyoko, Cox got along with John and Yoko. John told Jann Wenner (Rolling Stone Magazine, 1970) Cox had arranged for Don Hamrick to hypnotize Yoko and himself in order to help the couple stop smoking.25 Arthur Janov conducted primal screaming sessions for John and Yoko in 1970-71. John carried a lot of emotional baggage from his traumatic childhood—early separation from his father Freddy, the losses of his mother Julia, his Uncle George, his best friend Stu Sutcliffe, followed by sudden fame as a young adult. Janov conducted the first few sessions at John and Yoko’s home in England in Tittenhurst Park. Later, they continued the sessions for four months at Janov’s Primal Institute in California. The acclaimed rock couple rented a house in Bel Air—the area where Sharon Tate was murdered—so they could easily attend the Primal Institute sessions.26 As previously stated, Elliot Mintz became Lennon’s publicist mainly by flattering Yoko. And Mintz also lived in Los Angeles.

It is not beyond the realm of possibility that all four individuals—Cox, Hamrick, Janov, and Mintz—were FBI informants working out of the satanic house at Topanga Canyon in Los Angeles which Charlie Manson and his friends nicknamed the "Spiral Staircase." Manson described the diverse types of people who attended parties at the Spiral Staircase as people "who lived in the mountain communes, practicing things that would not be tolerated in the cities…nationally respected celebrities…some of the influential and wealthy, and on occasion, some who wore the cloth and preached the word of God."27 Based on Manson’s description of the Spiral Staircase, Cox, Janov, and Mintz certainly fit the profiles of people who attended parties there. With Cox, Hamrick, Janov, and Mintz manipulating Lennon’s life, it’s easy to understand how he might have been maneuvered into moving to the Dakota. A contingency plan for John’s assassination was likely established in 1965 after the Beatles’ unprecedented performance at Shea Stadium before 55,600 hysterical fans. It was apparently decided that the Beatles had become too powerful. The following year, 1966, the FBI began its assault, and John Lennon was the primary target. The following is a likely scenario of how the Bureau’s assault was carried out.

First, the Bureau gets Capitol Records to release an unauthorized album, Yesterday and Today (released, June 15, 1966), which has a grotesque cover photo of the Beatles wearing butchers’ smocks and holding dead babies (mutilated dolls). This is intended to frighten and harass the Beatles, but it doesn’t phase them. Their hectic schedule doesn’t allow enough time to obsess over how Capitol Records is managing the release of their recordings thousands of miles away in America. Second, the Bureau advises Capitol Records to eliminate three of John’s five songs from the version of Revolver released in America on August 5, 1966. His apparent lack of productivity will hopefully diminish his artistic stature in the eyes of American Beatle fans. Third, the FBI gets Paul McCartney to walk out on She Said She Said, one of John’s two songs that will appear on the American version of Revolver. Paul’s non-cooperation is intended to demoralize John and hopefully get him to produce inferior work; however, the plan is foiled because She Said She Said turns out great with George Harrison playing bass and singing Paul’s backup harmony part. Fourth, the Bureau gets informants (probably Derek Taylor and his cohorts) to give John LSD which eventually causes him to have "bad trips." John told Jann Wenner (Rolling Stone Magazine, 1970) that he received a message while on LSD telling him to "destroy your ego, and I did"28 Fifth, the FBI stages the Manila incident to put the fear of God into the Beatles and further demoralize them. Fifth, the FBI stages the "bigger than Jesus" controversy by waiting for John to make an unusual public statement, then misinterpret it in the most negative, damaging manner possible. Sixth, the FBI has one of its informants toss an exploding fire cracker on stage during a Beatles’ concert in Memphis on August 19, 1966. Everyone in the Beatles’ entourage thinks John has been shot. As a result, the Beatles stop touring in 1966.

After the Beatles’ touring stopped, John lived abroad under close security, a superstar unable to walk the streets without being mauled by adoring fans. Once John came to New York City in 1971, his fame had subsided somewhat and he was out of the cocoon. A tighter contingency plan for assassination was apparently activated. The plan was further intensified in June of 1973 when the couple moved to the Dakota; however, his vast influence was diminishing, so assassination was no longer a top priority. Nevertheless, the satanic symbols were all in place. Lennon was living in the place where Roman Polanski filmed Rosemary’s Baby. When a green light was finally given for assassination, the orthodox rabbis must have had a field day helping with the plot to kill him, making sure he was gunned down at the entrance of the Dakota where Adrian Marcato—the fictitious martyred witch in Rosemary’s Baby—was killed by an angry mob for conjuring up the living devil. Apparently the more fanatic Jews had placed a curse on Lennon. They seemed to take great pleasure in making him the object of their sadistic, satanic games: first by making a human voodoo doll of him (Charlie Manson), then by matching his death with a scene from Roman Polanski’s cursed movie, Rosemary’s Baby. How dare Lennon achieve such fame without their permission. Who was this man—a rock star, nonetheless—from the dirty port city of Liverpool to voice opposition to America’s foreign policy, to mock the Holocaust as he did in How I Won the War? John was safe as long as he remained a recluse, but when he decided to be a celebrity again, his days were numbered.

John & Yoko’s 15 month separation

About a year after befriending Mintz, John and Yoko separated; Mintz was right in the middle of the entire separation although he didn’t appear to have a romantic interest in Yoko. In the autumn of 1973, John and Yoko began a separation that continued for fifteen months.29 Amazingly, Mintz talked to the John and Yoko nearly every day, more than they spoke to each other during their renowned separation. Here is an excerpt from Ray Coleman’s book, Lennon, describing Mintz’s odd relationship with the famous couple during their period of estrangement:

A man who speaks and moves with total precision, [Mintz] shared with Lennon a similarly dry sense of humor and an interest in literature. During the fifteen-month period Lennon was away from Yoko, Mintz saw him and spoke to Yoko on the phone nearly every day. ‘Don’t ever ask me to keep a secret from the other,’ he told both of them. ‘You are both my friends.’30

The entire separation was very odd and was never been fully explained until 1998 when Yoko wrote several articles for a booklet which accompanied the Lennon Anthology, a collection of unreleased Lennon recordings in a box set of CDs. The following is Yoko’s explanation of why she and John separated:

YOKO ONO: In 1972, the night McGovern lost the election, John and I were invited to a party at Jerry Rubin’s apartment in the Village. It was a gathering of New York liberal intellectuals, some artists, musicians and many journalists. John became totally drunk and pulled a woman into the next room and started to make love. Nobody could leave the party because all the coats were in that room. We were all sitting there trying to ignore what was happening. The wall was paper thin and you could hear the noise, which was incredibly loud. A considerate musician put a Dylan record on to offset the sound. But that did not drown out the sound coming from "the room." In the middle of all this, a New York celeb woman chose to make conversation with me. "I don’t know how you feel about him…but we love him. He and his friends…what they did…but especially John…we all respect him tremendously. He’s a great man…he is a wonderful man…" It was something like that she kept repeating to me, with an angry look as if to blame me for not rejoicing for what was happening in that room. Then there was a long silence. Some woman quietly went into the room to retrieve her coat. Others followed. When John finally came out of the room, he said, later, that he had never seen me looking so pale. "I could never forget that face," he used to say for a long while.

Something was lost that night for me. Living with John was a very trying situation. But I thought I would endure all that for our love. I used to think that our love was a secret thing between us, so it didn’t matter what people said…let them. Our love was higher than the highest sky, and deeper than the deepest water. But was it? Now it seemed that there were some clouds I hadn’t noticed and the water looked murky after the splash. Jerry thought it was terrible that I couldn’t "forgive" John. "McGovern lost. All of us were totally devastated. You can imagine how John felt about it. It was a real blow to us. So he was drunk, for heaven’s sake!" "It’s not a matter of forgiving him or not forgiving him. I would not use that word. It’s more like I can’t ‘forget’ what happened. Call me a prude, but it just hit me in the wrong way." Inside, I felt like a shattered raggedy doll.

This was the prelude to the famous "Lost Weekend." The United States Government was trying to kick us out of the country because of our political stand. John and I had pretty much burned our bridge to England, with John marrying an oriental, returning the MBE to the Queen, and being arrested for possession of drugs, though the drug had been planted. My daughter had been kidnapped by my ex-husband, I became a dragon lady in the eyes of the public, and I lost my platform to express myself as an artist. The tension was compounded by nets of intrigues spun around us by sources which were sometimes not too clear. Yet, we thought nothing was more important than how we felt about each other. We can make it. We’re making it. Yes, it’s all right! But that night made me think. It took almost another whole year for me to decide on what to do, and I did. Extraordinary circumstances call for extraordinary solutions.

There was no fight or anything. We were having a warm conversation in the afternoon in our bed. I told John that I thought a trial separation would be a good idea. "We’re both still young and attractive, it’s crazy to stay together just because we’re married. I would hate that. That’s not what we were about, was it? We should see what happens…" I tried to make light of it. "What about LA? I remember you telling me how you had fun on a Beatle tour…"—that sort of thing. "Okay, but I don’t want to lose you," John said. "We’d probably lose each other if we stayed," I said.

I didn’t tell this to John, but I thought I would lose him. Hey, it’s John Lennon. It was obvious to everybody, except to John, that I was the loser. Every man and woman of our generation was going to be happy that finally I was not around their hero.

John was incredibly estatic for four days. He called me to thank me. "Yoko, you’re incredible. This is great! Thank you!" There was no sarcasm there. I was glad that he was happy. After four days he called me with a totally different voice, "I had enough. I want to come home." I laughed it off. It was too soon.

Alone, I started to do my work again. Charlotte Moorman greeted me by saying, "Welcome home, genius!" That made me feel good. I knew her from way back. But in 1974, she was already a very famous figure in the avant-garde music scene. "Why are you wasting your talent, Yoko? Just forget about those horrible people. You must immediately start working. I want to put your new work in this year’s Avant-Garde Festival….This year, it’s going to be in Shea Stadium…Oh dear, what am I saying?"* We laughed. My old friends, Andy Warhol, Allen Ginsburg and Ornette Coleman took me around a lot. I met William Burroughs through Allen. It was very different from the Rock Scene. I was a person again, not a dragon lady. A young gallery owner told me that he wanted to include me in his Contemporary Art Show. I thought it was nice that he asked, and I put a piece in the show. One day the gallery owner came to me and asked if I was going to the Madison Square Garden show that night. "What show?" "You don’t know? I thought you would be going, and if you were I was hoping that you would take me with you." It turned out that Elton John and John Lennon were doing the show. "Oh, I don’t know…" Obviously, I wasn’t too keen on going. "Let me think about it." I asked my secretary to simply send a gardenia each to Elton and John with a note saying congrats or whatever. But the gallery owner did not let go of the idea of going to the show. "Oh, come on, Yoko, please go." So at the last minute, I decided to go as a favor to this guy. It was Elton’s show, and John came out at the end as a surprise guest. People were so excited that the whole Garden was shaking. I looked at him and tears ran down my cheek. He was looking lonely. He was looking scared. He bowed once too often. This was not the John I knew. When he was with me, he wasn’t afraid of anything. I couldn’t stop crying. Everyone else was ecstatic. After the show, the gallery owner said, "Aren’t you going to take me backstage?" I thought, "Oh, give me a break!" But I took him. John couldn’t believe his eyes. We looked at each other for the longest time. We were saying nothings to each other, but we knew what it was. We couldn’t take our eyes off each other. It was terrible. Oh, God, please don’t do this to me, again, I said to myself. I want a life, remember? "You’re looking very good," John said, trying to sound cool. That’s how we came back together.

In hindsight, I’m glad that John had his "boys room" stuff - before he passed away. Who was to know that he didn’t have much time left to enjoy life? I remember John’s happy voice "Thank you, Yoko"…even if it was for four days…and I’m sure it wasn’t.31

So that’s Yoko’s version of why they split up for fifteen months. I suppose many women reading this must think John was a real cad because he had sex with another woman practically in front of his wife. Sure, he was wrong to do that, but let’s examine the story further because there are several interesting points. First, John’s adulterous sexual encounter—as improper and uncouth as it was—was not exactly the act of a homosexual or bi-sexual, as several writers claim he was. Frankly, getting an erection while one is extremely intoxicated, then having sex with female stranger is quite a physical feat. Shortly after John’s murder, the propagandists began writing books and articles claiming he was secretly homosexual. I presume this is why Yoko’s story about John adulterous tryst has been suppressed. It undermines the cover story that he was secretly gay or bi-sexual.

Second, in numerous books it has been reported that Yoko insisted John have a female companion during their separation, so he selected his secretary, May Pang, a twenty-two-year-old woman born in New York of Chinese parents. This story, however, does not match Yoko’s version. Yoko disclosed several personal details about the separation, but she never mentioned May Pang. While there is no question that May Pang was John’s companion, was it really Yoko’s idea for him to have a female companion, or was it someone else’s? Frankly, that story has never seemed completely believable to me.

When John and Yoko separated in the fall of 1973, he was about 33 and she was about 41. It goes against human nature for a 41-year-old woman who loves her 33-year-old husband to send him away accompanied by a 22-year-old chick. In addition, it’s interesting that Yoko sent John to LA, where Mintz lived. The following is Lennon biographer Ray Coleman’s version of John and Yoko’s separation and John’s 22 year old female companion, May Pang:

When John and Yoko agreed on the split, Yoko suggested John should head for California; to go outside America was impossible at the time because of the Green Card [immigration] problem, and anyway, Yoko said, he should experience Los Angeles. Elliot Mintz… says it was Yoko who said May should accompany John. ‘Obviously,’ says Mintz, ‘for John Lennon to go alone to Los Angeles, where he’d never been except with the Beatles, was out of the question. Here was a man who had not driven a car in America, could not walk into a supermarket and purchase food, who couldn’t take his laundry to the corner, who didn’t make phone calls, didn’t know how to compute a tip on a bill, didn’t know where to locate restaurants, and who hardly knew anyone in Los Angeles except me. He would have been totally helpless. It was practical to send his secretary, May Pang, with him to look after him. I suppose Yoko knew it was likely there would be intimacy between the two of them. She took a mature view, knowing John: "Better with May than galloping around with the golden groupies."32

Mintz’s description of John as a "totally helpless" babe in the woods does not ring true. I have read transcripts of various John Lennon interviews and listened to numerous taped interviews of him as well. He never came across as being "totally helpless" as Mintz described. His celebrity status made it difficult to do a lot of mundane things that most of us take for granted, but it wasn’t because he was helpless.

According to Paul Zollo and Michael Gray, Elliot Mintz is extremely manipulative and controlling. Yoko may have sent John away, but I suspect John’s living arrangements were set up completely by Mintz. He probably said things to Yoko like, "Johns’s a great man, a musical genius, but I have to tell you as a friend, his stardom and his personality are suffocating you. It would be good for both of you to separate. Don’t worry, just send him to LA. He’s still a little boy. He needs to grow up. He’s be fine. I’ll keep an eye on him. I love the guy like a brother. But he’s a handsome man, and an ex-Beatle. Women will be throwing themselves at him, and he’s only human. To keep him from straying too far, you should send that cute little secretary, May Pang, to keep him company and handle his business affairs. That way, he’ll be sexually satisfied but he won’t run around. I know it’s a tough thing for a woman to do, but it will be better for both of you. John really loves you."

I don’t know for certain that such a conversation took place, but I know that it is unnatural for a 41 year-old woman to turn her 33 year-old husband loose with a 22 year-old woman. Many people say Yoko did it because she’s sophisticated, because she’s Japanese, and so on. Sorry, but that just isn’t believable. Another thing that has always bothered me about Mintz is his conduct the night John was killed. Mintz moved in with Yoko and stayed for two months, although there is no evidence that they were romantically involved.33 This always struck me as pushy behavior. Some might call his conduct chivalrous; others would call it taking advantage of a grief-stricken woman. Obviously I hold the latter opinion.

Third, recall how earlier in this chapter we referenced the Church Committee’s report on dealing with the New Left. It stated that FBI agents "were instructed to gather information on the New Left’s ‘immorality’ and the ‘scurrilous and depraved’ behavior, ‘habits, and living conditions’ of the members of the targeted groups."34 It appears that the FBI may have manipulated or tempted John to have sex with another woman right in front of Yoko as a means of creating division. Keep in mind John and Yoko were more than a married couple. They were a political team who ran circles around the FBI and ultimately turned public opinion against US military involvement in Vietnam. Getting John to commit adultery and get caught by Yoko would break up their marriage and destroy their political partnership as well. John’s drunken lapse in morality was a win-win situation for the FBI.

According to Yoko, John’s sexual liaison happened in Jerry Rubin’s apartment in Greenwich Village. In Chapter 2, it was suggested that Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman were Jewish/FBI provocateurs. John said in an interview that Rubin and Hoffman latched on to Yoko and him as soon as they arrived in New York in 1971. "I landed in New York City," he said, "and the first people who got in touch with me were Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman."35 By 1975 John had apparently caught onto Rubin’s and Hoffman’s tricks. "I never hear from them," he told an interviewer. "They vanished into the woodwork…Jerry was been nothing but trouble and a pain in the neck since I met him. I decided, as he didn’t lead the revolution, I decided to quit answering the phone."36

It’s easy to blame people like John for committing acts of immorality when we’ve never walked in his shoes. Vast fame can unleash a dark side of a person, a side that would never be revealed had he/she not achieved such fame. The FBI’s stated mission against the New Left was essentially to cause such human weaknesses to surface, thereby causing the targeted individual(s) to self-destruct. It’s ironic that the man who initiated this policy, J. Edgar Hoover, was himself homosexual and a transvestite.

 

Go to Next Chapter

Go to Previous Chapter

Contents

Lennon Home Page

Main Home Page

ORDER BOOK

 

http://www.jfkmontreal.com/order_hardcopy.htm

ENDNOTES
 
1 Nuel Emmons & Charlie Manson, Manson: In His Own Words, 177-181
2 Vincent Bugliosi & Curt Gentry, Helter Skelter, pp 140-141
3 Nuel Emmons & Charlie Manson, Manson: In His Own Words, pp 184-185
4 SOURCES: (1) David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, pp. 293-94; (2) Paul is Dead web page: http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/3674/pid.html
5 David Pritchard & Alan Lysaght, The Beatles: An Oral History, pp. 293-94
6 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, pp. 576-577
7 Church Committee’s report, Book II, Intelligence Activities and Rights of Americans, "Domestic Covert Action," p 87
8 ibid, pp. 87-88
9 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, p 704 (Mentions date of Lennon’s 1968 drug bust.)
10 William Sullivan et al, The Bureau: My Thirty Years in Hoover’s FBI, pp 39-40 (Mentions FBI field office in London.)
11 Church Committee’s report, Book II, Intelligence Activities and Rights of Americans, "Domestic Covert Action," pp. 88-89
12 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, (1992) p 595.
13 ibid, pp 593-594. (Note: Elliot Mintz lived in LA when he first became acquainted with John and Yoko in 1972. He interviewed Yoko first, later John.)
14 SOURCES: (1) Terry Melcher’s association with the Byrds is described Byrd Watcher, reference http://ebni.com/byrds/relassociates11.html; (2) Terry Melcher: The Whole Picture, by Deb Lindsay, from Mark Lindsay’s official website (NOTE: Mark Lindsay was the lead singer in Paul Revere and the Raiders, another Sixties band produced by Melcher); reference http://www.marklindsay.com/terrymelcher.htm
15 Ben Macintyre, LA Times article, November 22 1994, Star 'critical' after transplant - David Crosby, http://www.4waysite.com/articles/transplant94.htm
16 Michael Gray, Song & Dance Man III: The Art of Bob Dylan, p 843 (The cited text are the words of Paul Zollo describing his 1991 interview with Bob Dylan, and how controlling Dylan’s publicist Elliot Mintz was.)
17 ibid, pp 843-844
18 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, (1992) p 716
19 ibid, pp 593-594.
20 Sharon Churcher (short article), 30 years on, Ono meets daughter, The Advertiser/January 8, 2001. (The article described Cox as "a Christian fundamentalist" who "initiated Kyoko into bizarre Doomsday cult The Walk." http://www.rickross.com/reference/general/general326.html
21 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, (1992) pp 513-514
22 ibid, pp 590 & 595. (Page 590 states that John and Yoko’s separation began in the autumn of 1973. Page 595 states that the separation lasted for 15 months.)
23 Fenton Bresler, Who Killed John Lennon? (1989), p 95
24 SOURCES: (1) Sharon Churcher (short article), 30 years on, Ono meets daughter, The Advertiser/January 8, 2001. (The article described Anthony Cox as "a Christian fundamentalist" who "initiated Kyoko into bizarre Doomsday cult The Walk." http://www.rickross.com/reference/general/general326.html; (2) Pat Napoliello, President of California Alliance for Inclusive Communities, Inc. (CAIC). Napoliello’s website has an article about The Walk which makes the following assertion: "The Walk is also involved in psychic and borderline occult practices." http://www.caic.org.au/miscbb/thewalk.htm
25 Jann Wenner, Lennon Remembers, pp. 73-75
26 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, (1992) p 515
27 Nuel Emmons & Charlie Manson, Manson: In His Own Words, p 123
28 Jann Wenner, Lennon Remembers, pp. 53-54
29 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, (1992), p 590 & 595. (Page 590 states that John and Yoko’s separation began in the autumn of 1973. Page 595 states that the separation lasted for 15 months.)
30 ibid, p 595
31 Yoko Ono, Lennon Anthology (CD): Introduction, pp. 13-14
32 Ray Coleman, Lennon: The Definitive Biography, (1992), pp. 592-593
33 ibid, p 683; Elliot Mintz’s two-month stay at the Dakota following Lennon’s murder is also mentioned in Fenton Bresler’s book, Who Killed John Lennon?, pp 243-244.
34 Church Committee’s report, Book II, Intelligence Activities and Rights of Americans, "Domestic Covert Action," pp. 88-89
35 ibid, pp 78-79
36 ibid, p 132