|
|
It has become apparent that the true identity of Eric B is
Robert Rosen, author of a book entitled Nowhere Man: The Final Days of
John Lennon. Mr. Rosen's book portrays Lennon in an extremely negative
light. Mr. Rosen has always claimed that he was given Lennon's
diaries/journals--which he used to write the book--by Lennon's former
personal assistant, Fred Seaman, shortly after Lennon was murdered in 1980.
Mr. Rosen claims that Seaman later broke into his apartment, ransacked the
place and stole the materials back. I have publicly stated several times
that I do not believe this story. It is my strong suspicion that Mr. Rosen
and Mr. Seaman worked together in a spy ring in a plot to assassinate
Lennon, and that plot was sponsored by former Air Force Secretary Hans Mark,
working with his colleague, the late Dr. Edward Teller. Dr. Teller was a
physicist and is credited by many as the father of the Hydrogen bomb;
however, critics claim he had little to do with its development and was a
poor scientist, but a master plagiarist. Dr. Teller was the real life
inspiration for the main character in Stanley Kubrick's movie, "Dr.
Strangelove."
Approximately a month ago I
noticed that Eric B had posted some unflattering things about me on a
Beatles newsgroup without me participating in a discussion. In fact, I had
not posted to any Internet discussion forums for well over a month. I had
long suspected that Eric B's true identity was Robert
Rosen, who was apparently angry with me for posting his picture on my
website and suggesting he was involved in a conspiracy to murder John
Lennon. Rather than respond directly to Eric B's recent Usenet comments, I
responded to his insults by starting
several discussion threads about Robert Rosen's possible involvement in
Lennon's murder. This was a tactic to see if I could get a reaction from
Eric B, which would support my suspicion that Eric B is actually Robert
Rosen. I even created the following page about Mr. Rosen's involvement in
Lennon's murder:
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Robert_Rosen/Rosen.htm
I didn't write a word about Eric
B on the Rosen page, or in the discussion threads about Rosen, but within
approximately a week, the entity known as Eric B had fully revised his hate
page about me. In other words, Robert Rosen (aka, Eric B) apparently
swallowed the bait, hook, line and sinker. Why would Eric B suddenly revise
his hate page unless he was either Robert Rosen or working for Robert Rosen?
The hate page had been online since January 2006 with virtually no changes.
After a year and a half without changes, Eric B suddenly decided to make
dramatic changes to the hate page only after I started several Usenet
discussion threads about Robert Rosen and created a page about Mr. Rosen's
involvement in Lennon's murder.
Consequently, for the remainder
of this page, I shall refer to Eric B as Robert Rosen since there is little
doubt as to his true identity at this point. Having stated that, I shall
respond to some of Mr. Rosen's comments from his hate page:
Robert Rosen wrote: "[Salvador
Astucia] is an internet character/troll that has haunted the rec.music.beatles and alt.assassination.jfk newsgroups for several years. He
has written several 'books' outlining his bizarre conspiracy theories
regarding the murders of JFK and John Lennon..."
It's interesting how Mr. Rosen
accuses me of writing "bizarre conspiracy theories" about JFK and John
Lennon, but he fails to mention how I publicly linked him (Robert Rosen) to
former Air Force Secretary Hans Mark in a government conspiracy to murder
Lennon. Mr. Rosen himself has openly acknowledged that he once wrote
speeches for the Secretary of the Air Force, but he never revealed that
individual's identity. The following text appears on the back of a paperback
version of his book, Nowhere Man, under the section called "About the
Author":
"Robert Rosen was born in
Brooklyn and lives in New York City. Over the course of a diverse career, he
has written speeches for the Secretary of the Air Force, erotica for men's
magazines, and personal essays for such publications as Mother Jones
and Soho Weekly News. He won a Hugo Boss poetry award in 1996.
Nowhere Man is his first book."
(from the back cover of Nowhere
Man, by Robert Rosen, published September 2002, paperback edition)
Hans Mark was Secretary of the Air Force
when Lennon was killed and was a leading advocate of the Strategic Defense
Initiative (SDI, nicknamed "Star
Wars" by the press) during the Reagan administration. Mark served as Secretary of the Air
Force from May 18, 1979 through February 9, 1981. After leaving that
position he became NASA Deputy Administrator, serving from July 10, 1981
through September 1, 1984. Mark and his father, Herman Mark, were both
friends and colleagues of Edward Teller. Hans Mark's paternal
grandfather, Herman Carl Mark, was Jewish, and frequently dined with
prominent Jews, including Theodor Herzl, the father of Zionism. Had
Lennon lived, there is little doubt he would have attempted to turn public
opinion against Star Wars, just as he successfully turned public opinion
against the Vietnam War in the late Sixties and early Seventies.
I have publicly and asked Mr.
Rosen to reveal the identity of the Secretary of the Air Force and he has
ignored the request. I sent him private emails asking the same question, and
he ordered me to stop sending emails. Hence, we must draw the following
conclusion:
|
|
 |
|
Rosen's
DEFENSE: Just because someone was once a speech writer for a
Secretary of the Air Force, and just because that same person
accepted stolen journals from John Lennon's estate and used said
stolen property to write a book that portrayed Lennon in an
extremely negative light, and just because the author made lots of
money from said book, this should not raise any red flags. |
|
Robert Rosen wrote:
"[Salvador] is a rabid anti-Semite and holocaust denier. He claims the Jews
planned in advance and brought about the Tsunami in the Philippines in 2004
by detonating a nuclear bomb in the ocean. Most curious is [Salvador's] theory
that the purpose of the media in using the word 'Tsunami' to describe the
tidal wave was to confuse people into thinking Tsunami is the name of a
small country."
Mr. Rosen's brief
statements cover three controversial topics: Anti-Semiticism, Holocaust
Denial, and the earthquake off the coast of Sumatra (aka, Tsunami) on
December 26, 2004 and the ensuing aftershocks. Consequently, I must reply to
each topic separately.
Anti-Semiticism
Under the pseudonym
of Eric B, Mr. Rosen has demonstrated that he is a liar when it comes to
anti-Semiticism. He re-defines the term to suit his agenda. On June 14, 2004,
in a Usenet discussion, the entity known as Eric B clearly rejected the
notion that my website was anti-Semitic. At that time, he was apparently
trying to befriend me as a means of controlling what I write. He was responding to someone who
called me anti-Semitic for suggesting that former Beatle
Paul McCartney might be of Jewish heritage. This is what the entity known as
Eric B wrote in my defense:
|
"Why does claiming someone is Jewish make them anti-semetic?
I looked over Salvador's website I don't see any hate or words like
'kike'. Did I miss something? Please explain. Eric B."
(from a topic
entitled "McCartney's Ethnicity" on rec.music.beatles, June
16, 2004. To read Eric B's entire message, with expanded headers,
click here.) |
Besides defending my honor in the
summer of 2004, the entity known as Eric B also claimed that he was a researcher.
Again, this suggests that Eric B is really Robert Rosen who claims to be a
researcher of John Lennon's personal life in the final years. In
the same thread, the entity known as Eric B made the following statements:
"Some of Salvador's research actually
overlapped some of my own. But I came to different conclusions." (To
read Eric B's entire message,
click here.)
I
asked Eric B repeatedly to tell me about his so-called research and describe
precisely how and where his conclusions differed from mine. Eventually he
got angry and broke off the discussion.
The Holocaust
It is quite obvious that Mr.
Rosen (or Eric B) is not upset because he disagrees with statements I have made about an
historical event that occurred before either of us was born (the Holocaust,
that is). The true reason Mr. Rosen is upset is because I have linked him to
John Lennon's murder. The mere fact that he refuses to respond to this
charge bespeaks more than I can say or write.
Frankly, most of the
public statements I have made about the Holocaust are not particularly
controversial, and I would not be ashamed to make them using my real name.
For example, on January 4, 2006, I made the
following statements in a discussion thread entitled, "Muslim Brotherhood
Denies Holocaust," a thread started by someone else. This is what I what I
wrote about the Holocaust that apparently inspired to Mr. Rosen (or Eric B) to come out the
closet and shift his opinion of me:
|
...To be
in good standing with the Holocaust Police, one must believe the
following five points about the Holocaust:
1. Six million Jews died at the hands of the Nazis between the 1938
and 1945.
2. The main cause of death was mass execution or genocide (as opposed
to typhus and starvation).
3. Hitler had a master plan to exterminate Jews.
4. Gas chambers were the main killing tool, although the exact number
of deaths from gas chambers is uncertain.
5. Hitler was not a human being. He was the Devil in human form.
Anyone who challenges or questions any of these five points will be
branded a Holocaust Denier...
[Salvador Astucia, Jan. 4, 2006]
(To see
full message, clear
here.) |
Every comment I wrote about the
Holocaust is not only true, but it meets the criteria of pure speech as
defined by Black's Law Dictionary. Pure speech is a legal category of free
speech that is most protected by the US Constitution. Black's Law Dictionary
defines pure speech as "words or conduct limited in form to what is
necessary to convey the idea."
The stated words
from Jan. 4, 2006 are "limited in form to what is
necessary to convey the idea." The idea being conveyed is merely defining
what people mean when they use the word Holocaust within the context of Nazi
Germany. To even consider this controversial is absurd. To suggest it is
hate speech is insane. There was nothing hateful about my comments. No Jewish person could
possibly be harmed as a result of anything I wrote. Only the most paranoid
among us would be afraid or intimidated by my words. My overall effort to
get others to define the Holocaust, within the context of Nazi Germany,
created quite an uproar. As previously stated, I did not start the
discussion thread. I merely joined in. Besides encouraging people to define
the Holocaust, I also asked people to
clearly state what it means to be a Holocaust denier. This line of discussion is
completely protected by the Constitution and will harm no one in any manner, so
it is ridiculous to consider it hate speech. Yet people began cloning my
screen name and writing all sorts of hateful things. Then Robert Rosen/Eric B created the
hate page which claims I am a Holocaust denier, although he and his friends
were afraid to define the Holocaust when asked in a civil discussion.
Apparently the only thing worse than denying the Holocaust is defining
it.
Regarding paranoia,
Robert Rosen and Hans Mark are justifiably paranoid, but not because of the
Holocaust or anything related to their people (Jewish people, that is). They
are justifiably paranoid because the world is slowly beginning to realize
that they were key players in the conspiracy to murder John Lennon.
Earthquake off
the Coast of Sumatra (aka, Tsunami)
Robert Rosen was
quite upset over an article
I wrote entitled Critical Thought
on Tsunami. Yes, I was critical of the American news media for
not reporting the facts accurately about a huge earthquake in Asia on
December 26, 2004. Having stated that, it is an outright LIE that I claimed
"the Jews" were responsible for the tragic event. I never cast blame on an
entire group of people, although I did speculate that the government of
Israel may have been involved in something more sinister than an earthquake,
and I explained my reasoning in the article. Criticizing Israel for a
specific horrific event is different from blaming that event on all Jews on
the planet, as the Robert Rosens of the world would have us believe. Israel
has used terror since its inception, and that is a fact. A recent
example of Israel's use of terror was the brutal attack of Lebanon in the
summer of 2006. I wrote an article on it entitled
Bush denies Lebanese Holocaust.
So yes, I believe
Israel is a brutal violent racist nation. Many Jews agree with me on that
point. Mr. Rosen's claim that I blamed the so-call tsunami on all Jews is
similar to his use of the term Holocaust Denier if someone merely questions
a few specific events about that tragic period.
Regarding the
earthquake off the coast of Sumatra on the day after Christmas in 2004,
yes, I thought the media overused the word "tsunami" and excluded basic
facts about the tragic event. For example, few people then and now realize
that the initial earthquake that caused the ensuing tsunamis occurred off
the coast of Sumatra. Few people realize that according to the United States
Geological Survey, there were approximately one-hundred (100) aftershocks in
the Andaman Sea, ranging in magnitudes of 4.0 to 7.9 on the Richter Scale,
from December 26, 2004 through January 2, 2005. The Andaman Sea is a body of
water that provides entry to the opium-rich Golden Triangle, a mountain
range that stretches across Burma, Thailand and Laos. The Golden Triangle
has historically been a major source of opium used by international drug
cartels for heroin production. Is this significant? Who knows, but it's
interesting that such horrific events tend to center around areas that
provide opium to worldwide heroin cartels. My research shows that leaders of
such cartels are sometimes used as mercenaries to carry out political
assassinations and other dirty business for large nations like the United
States, France, and others. In exchange, large opium crops are turned over
to these drug cartels in exchange for their unpleasant deeds. Sadly, this is how the world works. What I
have just described is a quick version of the history of Vietnam.
Setting aside the
issues of Jews and Israel for a moment, a major point of the tsunami article
was the catastrophic event that occurred off the coast of Sumatra on Dec.
26, 2004 was likely launched by human beings, not by Mother Nature. Few people realize
that underground nuclear tests often cause earthquakes. This is established
scientific fact. In fact, my tsunami article dovetailed Arab assertions that
the United States had conducted nuclear tests off the coast of Sumatra
which, in turn, set off the earthquake on Dec. 26, 2004 and the ensuing
tsunamis.
Many people
believe the Arab charge that the "tsunami" was caused by nuclear testing is ridiculous,
but history indicates otherwise. Most people apparently believe that a
nuclear explosion cannot set off an earthquake. This is absolutely
incorrect. It has been
documented that nuclear explosions have set off earthquakes in the past.
This fact was revealed in a 1992 book, Teller's War: The Top-Secret
Story Behind the Star Wars Deception, by William J. Broad, a man
with impeccable credentials. Besides
authoring several books, Mr. Broad writes about science for The New York
Times and has twice shared the Pulitzer Prize with colleagues there.
According to Mr. Broad, the United States government conducted an underground
nuclear test in Alaska, on November 6, 1971, which set off 22 minor
earthquakes. The location of the test was "some 1,400 miles west-southwest
of Anchorage in the Aleutian Islands" on the "uninhabited Island of Amchitka,"
according to Mr. Broad. (Ref. Teller's War, page 54) The nuclear test
was conducted under the direction of physicist Edward Teller and his team of
scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory located near
Berkley, California. The following excerpts from Teller's War,
by William Broader, describe how 22 earthquakes were set off by one
underground nuclear test in Alaska:
|
After several false starts, John F. Kennedy
and Nikita Khruschev in 1963 signed a compromise agreement to ban
nuclear testing in space, the atmosphere and the oceans--everywhere but
underground. It was a blow to the antimissile proponents. Rumpled and
shaggy-haired, his browed furrowed and his voice full of emotion, [Dr.
Edward] Teller
denounced the treaty before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The
West needed atmospheric tests, he said, to perfect antimissile arms.
...On September 24 [1963], the Senate ratified the treaty. Teller was
despondent. ... [pp. 51-52]
Sure he was right, Teller took his
antimissile efforts underground beneath the Nevada desert, exploding new
warheads that he hoped would be more adept at knocking out Soviet
missiles. ...The Defense Department had long pursued a low level of
antimissile research. But now, in the late 1960s, it redoubled its
efforts, hoping to build a nationwide system to protect people and
cities. In March 1968, amid the palm trees and balmy breezes of the
South Pacific, at the Kwajalein testing range, a prototype interceptor
known as the Spartan thundered unarmed off the launching pad for the
first time. In theory, it could hit enemy warheads high above the
atmosphere before they wreaked destruction on earth. Also in 1968,
Livermore got the go-ahead to develop a big new warhead for the
interceptor. ... [p 52]
By the late 1960s, the nation, deeply
divided over the Vietnam War, was also at odds over the idea of building
a system of ground-based interceptors that would cost billions and
involve scores of sites around the country meant to protect cities and
people. To liberals it seemed militarism gone mad. The Nixon
administration, which took office in early 1969, pressed ahead with an
antimissile system called Safeguard. It was to rely on the Spartan
missile to loft Teller's giant warheads high above the earth. However,
scores of respected scientific experts said Safeguard would be costly
and ineffective, arguing that it should be scrapped. As debate heated,
so did Teller. ...[p 53]
In the wilds of Alaska, some 1,400 miles
west-southwest of Anchorage in the Aleutian Islands, preparations picked
up for the explosive test of Teller's blockbuster. It posed dangers
there, too, despite the absence of civilization. The uninhabited island
of Amchitka was in a seismologically unstable area prone to earthquakes.
Experts feared the full blast could trigger tremors down the west coast
of North America. So a scaled-down test was planned, less than a quarter of
the ultimate size, to see how the area would hold up. On October 2,
1969, the warhead exploded under the tundra with a force of 1.2
megatons, the shock wave shaking the control center 40 miles away. The
test, code-named Milrow, produced no damaging earthquakes or tidal
waves. Even so, public opposition to further tests soared, the main
explosion being repeatedly delayed as attempts to block it were made in
Congress and the courts. In July 1971, an editorial in The New York
Times denounced the impending test as "potentially an ecological
catastrophe" because of the risk of earthquakes and the radioactive
contamination of Alaskan fisheries.
Meanwhile, more than 700 engineers and
scientists from Livermore gathered on Amchitka. They dug a mile-deep
shaft, placed the bomb at the bottom, and filled the hole with tons of
dirt and gravel. On the morning before D-Day, gale-force winds drove
rain horizontally. Pieces of sheet metal and two-by-fours flew across
the tundra. The power failed. The phones failed. The next day, the White
House hotline on Amchitka rang at 6:30 A.M. The U.S. Supreme Court had
just ruled, four to three, that the $190 million test, code-named
Cannikin, could proceed. At 11:00 A.M. on November 6, 1971, the bomb
flared beneath the tundra. The blast had a force of 5 megatons, some 330
times bigger than the Hiroshima bomb. It was the most powerful
underground explosion in American history. The shock wave set off 22
minor earthquakes, but no major problems were reported. Above the blast
site, a crater formed in the tundra that eventually filled with water,
creating a lake a mile and a half wide. [p 54] |
(Excerpts from Teller's War, by
William Broad)
(NOTE: William
Broad's book, Teller's War, also contains compelling information
about the Strategic Defense Initiative, SDI, which establishes a motive for
Edward Teller and the antimissile proponents to want to assassinate John
Lennon. See article for
more information.)
Most Americans are
unaware that nuclear explosions have caused real earthquakes in the past.
Consequently, to accuse the United States or Israel of causing the
catastrophic event known as "tsunami" seems unbelievable to most Americans.
But in reality the United States has the capability of creating earthquakes
through detonation of nuclear bombs, and has done so in the past. It should
be noted, in the 1971 Alaskan nuclear test, that the test was conducted a
mile below the earth's surface and scientists were under heavy political
pressure not to set off earthquakes. Even under such conditions, the nuclear
explosion set off 22 minor earthquakes. One can only imagine the level of
destruction that could be created if scientists made it their objective to
set off a large earthquake. My tsunami
article (Critical Thought on
Tsunami) merely expanded on that capability.
Robert Rosen wrote: "Critics of his theories are often labeled CIA or FBI agents and subject to
harassment and scurrilous accusations. He routinely sets up web pages to
libel his critics and will include personal information and photographs
without regard for their privacy. [Salvador] often plays both sides of the fence,
both as the persecutor and victim. He will also on occasion inexplicably
accuse someone who is critical of him of making 'death threats' against him."
I sometimes suggest that wild,
rude critics on Internet discussion forums might work for the FBI in some
capacity. The United States government spends untold billions of dollars on
its propaganda machinery. Only a fool would challenge that statement. The
FBI has a cyber division that deals exclusively with the Internet. No one
knows precisely what this group does, but the present and previous FBI
directors have acknowledged that the bureau monitors the Internet in some
capacity, although they presently use anti-terrorism as a pretext. It is
naive to think that the FBI does not monitor political discussion groups on
the Internet. As for the CIA, I tend to think they get blamed for a lot of
nonsense that the FBI does.
Regarding playing prosecutor and
victim, what is wrong with a private citizen writing about a crime? Such a
writing endeavor would obviously involve a degree of investigation, which
Mr. Rosen refers to as "prosecution." When people play dirty tricks on me by
creating hate pages, as Mr. Rosen has done, most reasonable people would
call that being victimized. In this case I am being harassed by a
cyberstalker who protects his own murderous tendencies by claiming the
person who exposed his criminal offenses is a Holocaust denier and an unreasonable critic of the FBI and CIA.
It is true that from time to time I have questioned the accuracy of the
Jewish death toll (six million) during the period known as the Holocaust;
and yes, I am a critic of the FBI and CIA. I'm also a critic of Israel. So
what?
Robert Rosen wrote:
"[Salvador] has on many occasions demonstrated a predilection towards homophobia
and an obsession with J. Edgar Hoover's alleged transvestite activities. It
seems he believes that slandering J. Edgar Hoover infuriates all the 'FBI
infiltrators' in RMB..."
Actually, it does
infuriate many of them. I often say rude things about the late FBI director
as a means of getting suspected FBI loyalists to blow their covers. All one
have to do is say, "J. Edgar Hoover was a ..." then pick a word that's most
unflattering. These idiots typically respond by saying something like: "I'm
not an FBI informant and don't you dare say another word about our beloved
departed director." Usually they aren't quite that direct, but they often
communicate messages very similar to that one.
Mr. Rosen criticizes me for
belittling the late J. Edgar Hoover, which is a backhanded admission that he
admires the FBI as an institution. Mr. Rosen claims I am homophobic
because I allegedly made comments about Mr. Hoover’s homosexuality and his
so-called penchant for wearing woman’s clothing to fulfill demented sexual
obsessions. There is no doubt that Mr. Hoover was homosexual, but he also
persecuted other homosexuals who did not agree with his ultra right-wing
agenda. I do not particularly care about Mr. Hoover's obvious compulsion to
engage in sodomy with other men, or his desire to wear black stockings and
women's panties, but it
was extremely hypocritical that he persecuted other homosexuals for
political reasons when he himself was the queen of queens. It seems to me that if
someone attempts to thwart discussions about Mr. Hoover's homosexuality and
his persecution of other gays, as Mr. Rosen has done, then that person is the
true homophobe. What's wrong with discussing Hoover's sexuality? He
certainly had no problem obsessing over the sex lives of other prominent Americans.
Robert Rosen wrote: "When you
are [Salvador] you have to get publicity for your 'books' somehow.
[Salvador] does it by joining various internet venues (using an assumed name) and
asking if anyone has ever read this great book (his own). [Salvador]'s propensity
for creating sock puppets to converse and agree with himself is well
documented. He has also encouraged others to create them in order to both
support him and denounce his critics."
Mr. Rosen's accusation that I use
"sock puppets" is a lie. He and his ilk use this tactic, not me. Mr. Rosen presented a
long list of names that he claims are me. A few are me, but I always made my
identity clear. Yes, I use different email addresses, but I sign them Salvador Astucia. That is not a sock puppet. Years ago I used a few fictitious
characters on Internet discussion groups, and Mr. Rosen didn't mention them.
There were only two or three, but I have not used them in several years. On
the other hand, Mr. Rosen and his ilk use fake personas incessantly. I admit
that the name Salvador Astucia is a pseudonym, and I have used more than one
email address for that pseudonym, but that is different from what Mr. Rosen
claims.
Regarding my use of
Internet discussion forums to promote my book, yes, that is true. What's wrong with that? Admittedly, the books
are controversial, and consequently, I have never seriously attempted to get
a major publishing company to publish them. Instead, I put the full books
online for anyone to read free of charge. For people who want a printed
copies, I sell the same information in bound book form. Again, what is Mr.
Rosen's problem? Writing a book and selling it on your own is as American as
apple pie. I never used information stolen from someone's estate to write
either book, the way Mr. Rosen used John Lennon's stolen journals as the
basis of his book, Nowhere Man. The difference between Mr. Rosen and myself
is Mr. Rosen is a common criminal. I am not. Another difference is Mr. Rosen
appears to get some sort of sadistic pleasure from tearing good people down.
A prime example is his filthy book, Nowhere Man.
Mr. Rosen wrote lots of
personal things about me in an attempt to reveal my true identity, and I
will not respond to them. He even put a link to what he believes is my home
address. I would caution any Jewish person filled with rage over the things
Mr. Rosen has written not to take any action because of him. It is quite
obvious that Mr. Rosen is using anti-Semitism as a smokescreen to conceal
his involvement in the murder of John Lennon.
|
|
|
|
Rosen's
DEFENSE: Just because someone was once a speech writer for a
Secretary of the Air Force, and just because that same person
accepted stolen journals from John Lennon's estate and used said
stolen property to write a book that portrayed Lennon in an
extremely negative light, and just because the author made lots of
money from said book, this should not raise any red flags. |
|
Robert Rosen wrote: "The
common thread that connects his theories is that they all ultimately point
to his beliefs in the 'Protocols of Zion' and his own anti-Semitic views."
Yes, I have written and commented
about the Protocols of Zion. I'm not sure what Mr. Rosen means by "beliefs,"
but it is correct that I have commented about the Protocols in my first
book, Opium Lords. Aren't we allowed to speak and write openly in the
United States on all topics? Isn't that what free speech is all about?
Apparently Mr. Rosen doesn't think so. Many people claim the Protocols were
a forgery, and perhaps they were. But forgery or not, the Protocols direct
Jews to "control the press." Only a fool would claim that this directive is
not a reality in the United States and most western nations.
Robert Rosen wrote: "Is this a hate page?
No, not at all. Although I find [Salvador]'s anti-Semitism reprehensible, I
bear no personal hate towards the man. But I believe it is important that
the [Salvadors] of this world be exposed for who they are, and held
accountable."
I like how Mr. Rosen refers to me
as "the Salvadors of this world." Such comments remind of the words of a
racist judge who once said of a black defendant: "Let's give this nigger a fair
trial so we can hang him quickly." Calling Mr. Rosen a hate monger is
putting it mildly. He is a cyberstalker protected by the United States
government because he once worked for a Secretary of the Air Force, Hans
Mark, and they were both deeply involved in a conspiracy to murder John
Lennon.
In closing, I would
like to remind readers that former Air Force Secretary and SDI advocate,
Hans Mark, is presently a professor of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering
Mechanics at the University of Texas in Austin. I encourage people to
contact him and his colleagues at the university and ask what the former SDI
advocate thought of the late John Lennon.
Additional evidence indicating Robert Rosen IS Eric B.
Eric B's email address on the stated hate page and in most Usenet postings
is as follows:
smartypants@nyc.rr.com
Robert Rosen's blog/website has an email address which can be viewed from
his homepage
(
http://robertrosen.blogspot.com
) and clicking "About Me" > "View My Complete Profile" > "Contact - Email".
The following email appears:
rrosen2727@nyc.rr.com
So Robert Rosen and Eric B are using the same ISP, Road Runner, and they
both live in or near New York City (NOTE: The tag for the ISP is
"@nyc.rr.com" for both Rosen and Eric. This means they both use Road Runner
in New York City.) This is not absolute proof, but it is another indicator.
Again, Eric B got very angry with me after I posted messages last month that
implicated Robert Rosen in John Lennon's murder. Eric got so angry that he
did a major upgrade to his hate page. Why would he do that unless he was
either Robert Rosen or worked for Mr. Rosen? Now we see that Eric B and
Robert Rosen are using the same ISP and living in the same city, New York
(nyc.rr).
SIMILAR STATEMENTS:
Eric B wrote on his hate page:
"[Salvador] is a rabid anti-Semite and holocaust denier."
Robert Rosen wrote in his blog in response to Salvador Astucia:
"However, since you are a known anti-Semite and Holocaust denier, I cannot
allow you to use this blog to promote your views."
Gibson Vendettuoli wrote (on Feb. 1, 2005) on the Education Forum:
"I'm not saying unpopular views should be grounds for banning people, but
this won't become a playground for Holocaust revisionists either. Keep that
off the forum, please."
Gibson Vendettuoli is an Internet entity who claims to be a teenage boy from
Rhode Island. In 2005, Gibson publicly confessed to forging my true identity
to a death threat email and sending it to an FBI field office in an attempt
to get agents to storm my home, which they did. Now we can see that even
Gibson Vendettuoli has a writing style similar to Robert Rosen's. Somehow
young Gibson escaped prosecution for sending a death threat to an FBI
office. It was obvious to me that the so-called teenager was being protected
an extremely powerful individual affiliated with the FBI and Justice
Department. If Gibson Vendettuoli was actually Robert Rosen who works for former Air
Force Secretary Hans Mark, that would certainly explain why Gibson Vendettuoli escaped prosecution.
On Jan. 26 2005, Gibson Vendettuoli made the following remarks to me on the
Education Forum (a discussion forum):
"Mr. Astucia, you've stated elsewhere that this is a pseudonym. I like the
work you've done, but you must use your real name here. Others have shed
their pseudonyms here...and you've apparently done it at others'
request...so please do it her also. I understand (we all do) if you don't
want to come under fire from others, but chances are no one will look here.
We've all been perfectly honest with each other and you should be, too."
Mr. Vendettuoli continued making annoying comments on the Education forum.
On Feb. 4, 2005, I received a long threatening private email from Mr.
Vendettuoli. The email contained the following demand:
"Cease talking about any parts of the JFK theory that involve Zionism."
"Keep it up," I replied. The Forum's actions, I advised, "are generating
more traffic to my website which result in more book sales. I'm crying
myself to the bank."
This was apparently the last straw for Mr. Vendettuoli (or perhaps Mr.
Rosen). Two days later, on Feb. 6, 2005, he reportedly forged my name on a
death threat email and sent it an FBI office.
On Feb. 9, 2005, two FBI agents came to my house and questioned me
extensively about the email.
You will notice the similar writing styles among Gibson Vendettuoli, Eric B,
and Robert Rosen. Their worldviews are identical. |
|
